Of course he wasn't. BUT THAT HAS ABSOLUTELY NO BEARING ON THE VALIDITY OR INVALIDITY OF THE SYLLOGISM.
You have confirmed my suspicion, which was that you had no idea what the question ("Is the syllogism valid or invalid?") meant.
So far, you have proved that you are consistent in using falsehoods about God in your syllogisms.
I prove the Godhead by scripture, not by syllogisms containing falsehoods.