Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer
In addition, in an apparent attempt to weed out Christian moles who might disrupt the presentation of the statue, the Satanic Temple required everyone who had a ticket (for which they paid $25 and up) to sign a quasi-legal document in which they agreed to “transfer” their soul to Satan.​

I don't see how this could be even slightly enforceable legally ("quasi" or otherwise).

Hypothetically, if my intent was to serve public interest by bringing a newsworthy event to light, of course I'd sign it. Though I'd probably use a fake name.

48 posted on 07/28/2015 3:45:02 PM PDT by RansomOttawa (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RansomOttawa
Though I'd probably use a fake name.

They thought of that, and put language in the contract that simply by your signing of the document, whether real or fake name, was binding.

Like I said, if you'd already bought a ticket, and if that ticket didn't disclose the necessity of signing a contract even after buying the ticket, then they are guilty of bait and switch, and can be sued for it.

74 posted on 07/29/2015 5:59:34 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson