Posted on 06/27/2015 6:34:38 PM PDT by Morgana
Amen and Amen!!
Amen and Amen!!
They are taught according to altered “catholic” history...which is changed to accommodate their teachings, rituals, and practices.
.....they're like liberals who change History to accommodate their agenda.
No actually he just understood the scriptures he was reading
His full quote.... I know very well that in Romans 3 the word solum is not in the Greek or Latin text the papists did not have to teach me that. It is fact that the letters s-o-l-a are not there. And these blockheads stare at them like cows at a new gate, while at the same time they do not recognize that it conveys the sense of the text -- if the translation is to be clear and vigorous [klar und gewaltiglich], it belongs there. I wanted to speak German, not Latin or Greek, since it was German I had set about to speak in the translation.
Now as for the idea he added to the bible the way Rome did...you might want to look further
Luther offers another line of reasoning in his Open Letter on Translating that many of the current Cyber-Catholics ignore, and most Protestants are not aware of:
Furthermore, I am not the only one, nor the first, to say that faith alone makes one righteous. There was Ambrose, Augustine and many others who said it before me.
Now here comes the fun part in this discussion.
The Roman Catholic writer Joseph A. Fitzmyer points out that Luther was not the only one to translate Romans 3:28 with the word alone.
At 3:28 Luther introduced the adv. only into his translation of Romans (1522), alleyn durch den Glauben (WAusg 7.38); cf. Aus der Bibel 1546, alleine durch den Glauben (WAusg, DB 7.39); also 7.3-27 (Pref. to the Epistle). See further his Sendbrief vom Dolmetschen, of 8 Sept. 1530 (WAusg 30.2 [1909], 627-49; On Translating: An Open Letter [LuthW 35.175-202]). Although alleyn/alleine finds no corresponding adverb in the Greek text, two of the points that Luther made in his defense of the added adverb were that it was demanded by the context and that sola was used in the theological tradition before him.
Robert Bellarmine listed eight earlier authors who used sola (Disputatio de controversiis: De justificatione 1.25 [Naples: G. Giuliano, 1856], 4.501-3):
Origen, Commentarius in Ep. ad Romanos, cap. 3 (PG 14.952).
Hilary, Commentarius in Matthaeum 8:6 (PL 9.961).
Basil, Hom. de humilitate 20.3 (PG 31.529C).
Ambrosiaster, In Ep. ad Romanos 3.24 (CSEL 81.1.119): sola fide justificati sunt dono Dei, through faith alone they have been justified by a gift of God; 4.5 (CSEL 81.1.130).
John Chrysostom, Hom. in Ep. ad Titum 3.3 (PG 62.679 [not in Greek text]).
Cyril of Alexandria, In Joannis Evangelium 10.15.7 (PG 74.368 [but alludes to Jas 2:19]).
Bernard, In Canticum serm. 22.8 (PL 183.881): solam justificatur per fidem, is justified by faith alone.
Theophylact, Expositio in ep. ad Galatas 3.12-13 (PG 124.988).
To these eight Lyonnet added two others (Quaestiones, 114-18):
Theodoret, Affectionum curatio 7 (PG 93.100; ed. J. Raeder [Teubner], 189.20-24).
Thomas Aquinas, Expositio in Ep. I ad Timotheum cap. 1, lect. 3 (Parma ed., 13.588): Non est ergo in eis [moralibus et caeremonialibus legis] spes iustificationis, sed in sola fide, Rom. 3:28: Arbitramur justificari hominem per fidem, sine operibus legis (Therefore the hope of justification is not found in them [the moral and ceremonial requirements of the law], but in faith alone, Rom 3:28: We consider a human being to be justified by faith, without the works of the law). Cf. In ep. ad Romanos 4.1 (Parma ed., 13.42a): reputabitur fides eius, scilicet sola sine operibus exterioribus, ad iustitiam; In ep. ad Galatas 2.4 (Parma ed., 13.397b): solum ex fide Christi [Opera 20.437, b41]).
See further:
Theodore of Mopsuestia, In ep. ad Galatas (ed. H. B. Swete), 1.31.15.
Marius Victorinus (ep. Pauli ad Galatas (ed. A. Locher), ad 2.15-16: Ipsa enim fides sola iustificationem dat-et sanctificationem (For faith itself alone gives justification and sanctification); In ep. Pauli Ephesios (ed. A. Locher), ad 2.15: Sed sola fides in Christum nobis salus est (But only faith in Christ is salvation for us).
Augustine, De fide et operibus, 22.40 (CSEL 41.84-85): licet recte dici possit ad solam fidem pertinere dei mandata, si non mortua, sed viva illa intellegatur fides, quae per dilectionem operatur (Although it can be said that Gods commandments pertain to faith alone, if it is not dead [faith], but rather understood as that live faith, which works through love). Migne Latin Text: Venire quippe debet etiam illud in mentem, quod scriptum est, In hoc cognoscimus eum, si mandata ejus servemus. Qui dicit, Quia cognovi eum, et mandata ejus non servat, mendax est, et in hoc veritas non est (I Joan. II, 3, 4). Et ne quisquam existimet mandata ejus ad solam fidem pertinere: quanquam dicere hoc nullus est ausus, praesertim quia mandata dixit, quae ne multitudine cogitationem spargerent [Note: [Col. 0223] Sic Mss. Editi vero, cogitationes parerent.], In illis duobus tota Lex pendet et Prophetae (Matth. XXII, 40): licet recte dici possit ad solam fidem pertinere Dei mandata, si non mortua, sed viva illa intelligatur fides, quae per dilectionem operatur; tamen postea Joannes ipse aperuit quid diceret, cum ait: Hoc est mandatum ejus, ut credamus nomini Filii ejus Jesu Christi, et diligamns invicem (I Joan. III, 23) See De fide et operibus, Cap. XXII, §40, PL 40:223.
Source: Joseph A. Fitzmyer Romans, A New Translation with introduction and Commentary, The Anchor Bible Series (New York: Doubleday, 1993) 360-361.
Even some Catholic versions of the New Testament also translated Romans 3:28 as did Luther. The Nuremberg Bible (1483), allein durch den glauben and the Italian Bibles of Geneva (1476) and of Venice (1538) say per sola fede.
http://beggarsallreformation.blogspot.com/2006/02/luther-added-word-alone-to-romans-328.html
Wait... what????
A Catholic who now says that they have assurance of salvation????
Isn't that the sin of presumption or something????
And Christians are castigated for expressing confidence in their salvation?
Rules for thee but not for me, eh?
Interesting! Very interesting!
If it weren't for double speak would Catholics have anything to say?
Let me explain this to you. a number of the non-Catholics were (not in so many words) were blaming the Catholic justices on SCOTUS for the decision on “marriage rights” for homosexuals. In the interest of being consistent the same non-Catholics would have to blame Roe v. Wade on protestantism.
I don’t think the ruling was actually about rights for sexual degenerates, was it? I seem to read it as a sweeping removal of states rights to define marriage and license same, shifting that power to the fed alone, without actually defining for the fed what shall be the new laws from fedzilla. Besides, defining a sexual degenerate like Kagan or Stevens as ‘catholic’ is a st-re-t-ch. Living in defiance of what God has defined an abomination doesn’t comport with the Catholic traditions or teachings, regardless of what the talking mule in Rome now says. Asa for Kennedy, well he is likely so senile that his clerks who are likely gay-riddled probably made his vote for him and write his issues.
MD Priest calls out unfaithful Catholics homosexuals in priesthood that set stage for USSC decision
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/3305596/posts
Yup; until some proof that he WASN’T appears.
Then set the lurkers straight!
I just posted from Catholic sources.
You may do the same...
At least SOME Muslims are devout enough to blow themselves up when taking out a perceived place of sin.
Where are the Catholics who have given THEIR lives to destroy the Palaces of CHOICE??
Okay thanks for not paying attention to what was said, have a good day.
I will give it a listen. Thank you.
Oh I paid attention to what was said. You obviously didn't like my response. Tuff.
Your non response.
“Then set the lurkers straight!”
Already did.
“I just posted from Catholic sources.”
So did I.
“You may do the same...”
Already did.
From the pope who presided over Vatican I: https://www.ewtn.com/expert/answers/outside_the_church.htm
Anti-Catholicism: Lead paint chips for the Protestant mind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.