Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Burkianfrombrklyn

You would start with men, while we start with the Bible.


11 posted on 06/19/2015 7:23:45 PM PDT by .45 Long Colt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: .45 Long Colt

Sorry don’t understand. That;s a sound bite? The only “Bible” Our Blessed Lord knew was the Septuagint, although it is not a “Bible” per se. As for the Bible as most (but not all) non-Catholics know was put together in the last few hundred years, which seems fairly man-made to me, no? Specifically, Luther relegated Macabees etc to a lesser part of his “Bible” on his own initiative, based on the Council of Jamnia. Now, most non-Catholic Biles (except for many Anglican Bibles) don’t even include those books (as Calvin, Zwingli, Cranmer and Luther’s “Bible” did for years). Again, seems like a lot of man made decisions there.


48 posted on 06/20/2015 9:20:45 AM PDT by Burkianfrombrklyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson