Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: cothrige

I agree with you, cothrige, but unfortunately, MANY people, including Catholics throw up the “but they don’t UNDERSTAND” argument. I was only trying to respond to that inevitability.

You are correct, of course, that “understanding” is not necessary for the reception of the sacraments. I would be perfectly OK with lowering the ages all the way down to newborn. It is most imperative that the graces not be withheld.

Regards,


24 posted on 06/04/2015 6:07:21 AM PDT by VermiciousKnid (Sic narro nos totus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: VermiciousKnid; cothrige
I would be perfectly OK with lowering the ages all the way down to newborn. It is most imperative that the graces not be withheld.

The majority of Eastern Catholic Churches administer the sacraments of initiation at the same time. Only the Latin Church has doled them out over a period of years. . The "don't understand" argument is quite ridiculous. We all remember that question in our Baltimore Catechism: "What is a Sacrament?" R: A Sacrament is an outward sign instituted by Christ to give grace. (although mine said 'conveys grace'). We need those graces to stay on course throughout our life.

25 posted on 06/04/2015 11:13:37 AM PDT by NYer ("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson