Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: grumpa

Preterism is false.


5 posted on 05/25/2015 6:36:00 PM PDT by beethovenfan (Islam is a cancer on civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: beethovenfan
Preterism is false.

Indeed it is, as also amillennialism mentioned in the lead article.

7 posted on 05/25/2015 7:17:51 PM PDT by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: beethovenfan

Seriously? That’s all you got?


10 posted on 05/25/2015 7:57:09 PM PDT by shane1271
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: beethovenfan

That’s not much of an argument. There are more than 250 direct and indirect preterist time statements in the New Testament. That doesn’t include time related material such as Daniel’s 70 Week prophecy, which was expected to be wrapped up in the generation of the Apostles. It’s going to take more than just a mere assertion to prove your point.


11 posted on 05/25/2015 7:57:09 PM PDT by dwilkins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: beethovenfan
Preterism is false

Some of it anyway. Most errors are from those who do the interpretations and try to stay withing their own pre-determined meme so as to not upset their own religion's apple cart.

23 posted on 05/26/2015 4:31:53 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson