Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: aMorePerfectUnion; Steelfish; All
Empty Claims Placemarker #2

On this spot, I note that Steelfish has not provided a single shred of evidence to support the canonicity of the epistle of James.

He has been asked repeatedly to produce the official RC positions on blatant contradictions between James and authentic authors of Scripture.

He has not.

If there are official RC positions on these contradictions, why doesn’t he publish them here to help other believers?

The answer must be that Steelfish has no proof to back up his dismissal of these contradictions. As such, it is just hollow opinion. No more. No less.

730 posted on 05/30/2015 10:07:22 PM PDT by DeprogramLiberalism (<- a profile worth reading)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 725 | View Replies ]


To: aMorePerfectUnion; Steelfish; All
Empty Claims Placemarker #3

On this spot, I note that Steelfish has not provided a single shred of evidence to support RC catechism 823 that the RC church is the bride of Christ.

He has been asked repeatedly to produce the official RC evidence for this doctrine and rebut the argument that Scripture only ever describes the Church as masculine.

He has not.

If there is an official RC position to support this RC church = bride of Christ doctrine, why doesn’t he publish it here to help other believers?

The answer must be that Steelfish has no proof to back up this 823 catechism. As such, it is just empty opinion. No more. No less.

731 posted on 05/30/2015 10:24:23 PM PDT by DeprogramLiberalism (<- a profile worth reading)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 730 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson