[PROCON]

Nothing to say but, Amen.

[Trapped Behind Enemy Lines]

After Jesus forgives sinner, He says “Go, and sin no more!”

[Yosemitest]

Homosexuals aren't "born that way".
They had to "Earn their REPROBATE MIND" by refusing God ~ not once, ~ not twice, ~ but THREE times!

You need to not only read, BUT STUDY this link
I especially agree with its last paragraph.

" The Church NEVER can and NEVER will give satisfaction—
and the homosexualist knows it,
for he knows the words against him are INERADICABLE
—to the declared and impenitent homosexual,
the person who, through an act of the vermiculate will,
has identified his person with a sin,
whether HE DEMANDS ACCEPTANCE OF HIS SIN
through "love,"
or VINDICATION
THROUGH IDENTIFICATION OF HIS PERCEIVED ENEMIES AS BIGOTS.
Whether HE PRESENTS HIMSELF as an object of love or indignation,
what HE DEMANDS in either case IS ACCEPTANCE
not of the person,
but OF THE SIN-bound and SIN-DEFINED person.
HE DEMANDS the declaration of SPIRITUAL AUTHORITY that
THERE IS NOTHING OBJECTIVELY DISORDERED about this BINDING OF MAN TO SIN,
and ASSURANCE that THIS MONSTROUS AMALGAM can indeed ENTER the kingdom of heaven.
This can NEVER HAPPEN among Christians UNTIL THEY ABANDON Christianity,
WHICH IS AT WAR WITH EVERY SIN,
and whose indelible constitution
places ALL PERVERSIONS of the perfect man
AT THE MUZZLE of its canons. "

There will be NO HOMOSEXUALS ( NOT ONE ) in the afterlife.
They WILL BE ASHES UNDER the soles of your feet ! ! !



TO TOLERATE HOMOSEXUALS IS EVIL.
This is what we get when we FAIL to OBEY God.
For it is written:

“ For whosoever shall commit ANY of these abominations,
even the SOULS that commit them
SHALL BE CUT OFF from among their people. ”

Those who support homosexuals are against our Heavenly Father and His Son Jesus Christ.
These anti Christ people only bring destruction on us ALL.
I have NO sympathy for homosexuals!

Homosexuality is a "Mark" of disobedience.

It was given by our Heavenly Father to test us
to see ... if we will OBEY our Heavenly Father,
and abide by His commandments, statues, and ordinances.

Someone once asked

"Why are they [homosexuals] all so angry?"

The answer is in the definition of "REPROBATE".

rep·ro·bate \ˈre-prə-ˌbāt\ a. [L. reprobatus, reprobo, to disallow; re and probo, to prove.]

1. Not enduring proof or trial; not of standard purity or fineness; disallowed; rejected.


Reprobate silver shall men call them, because the Lord hath rejected them. Jer. 6.




2. Abandoned in sin; lost to virtue or grace.

They profess that they know God, but in works deny him, being abominable and disobedient, and to every good work reprobate. Titus 1.

3. Abandoned to error, or in apostasy. 2Tim. 3.

And the reason"why" is given in the Bible.

God has a cure for homosexuals.

But will we OBEY our Heavenly Father?

"Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect
that God is just,
that his justice cannot sleep forever."

[MortMan]

Homosexual activists are fond of quoting the first half of John 8:11: "Neither do I condemn you." They are not so fond of quoting the second half. In fact, they quite pointedly ignore it as if it weren't even there. But wishing it away doesn't make it disappear.

Am I the only one who finds it ironic that the author didn't mention the words of the second half of the verse in this paragraph?

[MrB]

Jesus stooped and wrote something on the ground

---

Some on FR speculated that He drew a cartoon of Muhamed.

[Vigilanteman]

(There is no word, by the way, about the fate of the miscreant male in this sexually illicit liaison.)

I recently visited a Sunday School class were this very thing was discussed. It was interesting, to say the least.

The consensus was that the miscreant male was somebody who was pretty important, possibly even a member of the group who was in such a big hurry to get her stoned and kill the evidence.

Of course, that doesn't make it so, but it would certainly explain the clamor for swift "justice" and the melting away after the brief statement of Jesus.

[FNU LNU]

“Since he was the only one without sin, he alone had the moral authority to stone her to death.”

Would this mean that no one could ever be stoned to death for adultery, since no one was sinless except Jesus?

And, since Jesus was not a witness to her adultery, could he have stoned her to death? Under the law, no one could be put to death for any sin, except at the mouth of two or three witnesses.

[wagglebee]

Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

[cuban leaf]

Pretty much every time the subject comes up I bring this up. It’s crystal clear, but many of them don’t want to hear it.

[Dr. Thorne]

"Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites..." - 1 Cor. 6:9

Paul exphasizes that homosexuals will not enter the Kingdom of God. This means that they spend eternity in Hell.

How can any Christian, who claims to love their neighbor, approve of that neighbor's sin that will consign him to Hell? The same-sex marriage crowd are a devilish bunch.

[Salvation]

Courage and Encourage [spiritual support for persons w/ same-sex attraction who are striving to overcome...

[Mrs. Don-o]

This is all true, and I very much agree with it.

I do wonder about the fact that Jesus said, explicitly, four times, that anyone who marries a divorced person (absent the kind of porneia that would render the first marriage annulled) is committing adultery. Huge numbers of Americans, including Christians, are getting divorced/remarried or marrying divorcees and consequently living in a state of ongoing, legalized, public adultery.

Are any of their pastors telling them to cease sexual relations and sin no more?

[onedoug]

Matthew 5:17-20

The Law was and is quite clear.

[Some Fat Guy in L.A.]

It’s always bothered me that Jesus let the woman go, IF she had actually committed adultery - was Jesus soft on adultery?. But He also proclaimed that the Law was still valid, so obviously not.

Jesus of course knew if she had or hadn’t committed adultery - so my guess is that the whole thing was a setup from the get-go, no actual adultery took place, and the woman was in on the scam.