Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Texicanus
You're assuming the thief hadn't already been baptized.

That's right...


Luke 23
42 And he said unto Jesus, Lord, remember me when thou comest into thy kingdom.


He called Jesus, "Lord". And at that time only the true believers were still with Jesus. The rest were mocking and calling for His crucifixion.

And all true believers would have been baptized as was Jesus' commandment.

Baptism is necessary for repentance. Which makes Jesus' actions make sense.
77 posted on 05/08/2015 7:41:26 AM PDT by StormPrepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: StormPrepper

Thank you for enlightening me. I need to restudy the timing of all of this since the new covenant and the church was not established until after Jesus’s death, burial, and resurrection. At this time, the thief was most likely a Jew who had not been baptized. Was the act of baptism necessary of both Jew or Gentile in either the old or new covenants or both?

Thanks again, FYI, as a true believer I was baptized way back in my college days. Wouldn’t want to be caught on a misunderstanding or technicality. :)


78 posted on 05/08/2015 2:23:13 PM PDT by Texicanus (Texas, it's like a whole 'nother country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson