Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o
>>You put the word "church" in Philadelphia, in quotes, as if you wished to say, "so-called church". Do you not consider it a church?<<

Not in the framework of the Catholic understanding of the word "church". The ekklesia of Christ has little similarity with the Catholic understanding of the word "church".

>>Generally speaking, in moral terms there are two kinds of sex "treatments".<<

I have no interest in Jenner other than to say he's perverted the natural order. My comment had nothing to do with his sexual situation. It had to do with his comment about scripture not specifically saying it's wrong. That type of comment comes often from Catholics when trying to defend beliefs and practices they have.

231 posted on 04/29/2015 6:24:28 AM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]


To: CynicalBear

Then you do agree that Natural Law and Scriptural Law, properly understood, reach the same conclusions?


232 posted on 04/29/2015 6:49:21 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (May the Lord bless you and keep you, may He turn to you His countenance and give you peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]

To: CynicalBear

As I understand it, the “ekklesia” in Philadelphia (in Asia Minor) would be considered a “local church” according to Catholic ecclesiology. That is, if they had a bishop.


233 posted on 04/29/2015 6:51:20 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (May the Lord bless you and keep you, may He turn to you His countenance and give you peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson