Oh come now Mrs. Don-o. How many times have we seen comments about how the Catholic Church was the only "church" until the Reformation? According to Catholics here there was no other.
>>And once again. We are not putting Magisterium "above" Scripture.<<
Evidence would say otherwise. It's clear to me that Catholics put what the "magisterium" says above what scripture teaches. It's the "magisterium" to whom they appeal not only for what scripture says but additions to scripture as well.
>>And if some find parts of Holy Scripture hard to understand<<
I addressed that in my last post.
>>Paul say that God appoints teachers in the Church?<<
See Acts 17:11
"I wrote to the church,
but Diotrephes,
who loves to dominate,
does not acknowledge us.
Therefore, if I come,
I will draw attention to what he is doing,
spreading evil nonsense about us.
And not content with that,
he will not receive the brothers,
hindering those who wish to do so
and expelling them from the church."
So yeah, the Catholics who say there were no other churches before the Reformation, are mistaken in historic point of fact. There have always been other churches. You're welcome to Diophenes.
You're welcome, as well, to the Cathari, the Paulicians, and the Donatists, cited by some (such as J.M. Carroll) as precursors of today's "Bible Christians". Unfortunately, they are not doctrinally coherent enough to give you a real hermeneutic of continuity (e.g. the Paulicians and Cathari said that all of physical reality, including the human body, was created by the God of Evil) --- and not early enough to give you such ancient foundations as you have in Diophenes.
"It's the "magisterium" to whom they [Catholics] appeal not only for what scripture says but additions to scripture as well."
This is in fact true, if by "additions to scripture" you mean "Natural Law." The Catholic Church holds that Scriptural Law and Natural Law both have the same Divine Author, and that, thanks to the authority which Christ has given His Church, the Magisterium is competent to teach authoritatively about both.
As Jesus said to his appointed teachers (the 70 disciples) in Luke 10:16, "He that hears you hears me; and he that despises you despises me; and he that despises me despises Him that sent me."
And that reminds me of the original topic of this thread, which is Bruce Jenner's claim that Jesus is OK with his "sexual reassignment" project, because "sexual reassignment" is not condemned in Scripture. Do you think he's right?