Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic Apologetics: Non-Catholics in the Communion Line
Catholic Answers ^ | April 15, 2015 | Michelle Arnold

Posted on 04/15/2015 1:38:52 PM PDT by NYer

There are usually a few Masses per year at which there can be expected to be a large number of non-Catholics present. Christmas and Easter Masses are popular with non-Catholics, mainly because they are visiting Catholic family and friends. Nuptial Masses, especially when one of the parties to be married is a non-Catholic Christian, will have large turnouts of non-Catholics (sometimes up to half the congregation). Non-Catholics can also be expected at Masses offered for other sacramental firsts and life-cycle events, such as confirmations and funerals.

This reality raises a common question for the apologists here at Catholic Answers: What should happen at Communion time? Here's a recent question I received on the issue.

At my granddaughter's First Communion, the priest announced that if there were any Episcopalians present they could receive Communion because they believe in the Real Presence. Other Protestants could come forward for a blessing. When did the teaching change on receiving Communion? I thought you had to be in full union with Rome. My son-in-law is Protestant and this caused real confusion for us.

In this case, both the priest and the inquirer were mistaken, to some extent, in their respective understandings of the Church's sacramental discipline.

The priest was incorrect that Episcopalians ordinarily may receive Communion at a Catholic Mass. Since Episcopalians do not have valid holy orders, they do not have a valid Communion. The fact that they believe that Jesus is in some way present in the Eucharist does not mean that they fully share Catholic faith in the nature of the Real Presence.

The inquirer also was not entirely correct that those who receive Communion must be "in full union with Rome." Orthodox Christians, and members of a few other Christian churches with valid holy orders and a valid Eucharist, are allowed to receive Communion when attending Catholic Masses. The Guidelines for the Reception of Communion state:

Members of the Orthodox churches, the Assyrian Church of the East, and the Polish National Catholic Church are urged to respect the discipline of their own churches. According to Roman Catholic discipline, the Code of Canon Law does not object to the reception of Communion by Christians of these churches (canon 844 §3).

Occasionally, under special circumstances, a baptized non-Catholic Christian may receive the Eucharist if there is grave need, the Christian "spontaneously asks" for the sacraments, and if he cannot approach his own minister:

Because Catholics believe that the celebration of the Eucharist is a sign of the reality of the oneness of faith, life, and worship, members of those churches with whom we are not yet fully united are ordinarily not admitted to holy Communion. Eucharistic sharing in exceptional circumstances by other Christians requires permission according to the directives of the diocesan bishop and the provisions of canon law (canon 844 §4) [Guidelines].

These guidelines, which are based on canon law, are rather complex and shot through with exceptions to the general principles. That can make it difficult for clergy and laity alike to offer blanket guidelines for reception of Communion when non-Catholics are present at a Catholic Mass.

And, all too often, off-the-cuff announcements made by the presider at Mass, usually right before Communion is distributed, do not accurately reflect the Church's discipline on reception of the Eucharist. It may be more common these days to hear a variant of the announcement quoted earlier, inviting "all who believe in the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist" to receive Communion, but the less-common announcement that "Communion is reserved to practicing Catholics in a state of grace" also is problematic.

What can be done? Here are a few suggestions for clergy and laity alike.

Learn the guidelines. I trust that clergy are fully instructed in the guidelines for reception of the sacraments while in seminary. But because the guidelines are not easily boiled down to either "Come one, come all" or "Practicing Catholics only!" then I can only suggest regular reading of the USCCB's Guidelines and the relevant section from canon law (canon 844). We have looked at the USCCB's summary; here is canon 844:

§1 Catholic ministers may lawfully administer the sacraments only to Catholic members of Christ's faithful, who equally may lawfully receive them only from Catholic ministers, except as provided in §2, 3, and 4 of this canon and in canon 861 §2.

§2 Whenever necessity requires or a genuine spiritual advantage commends it, and provided the danger of error or indifferentism is avoided, Christ's faithful for whom it is physically or morally impossible to approach a Catholic minister, may lawfully receive the sacraments of penance, the Eucharist, and anointing of the sick from non-Catholic ministers in whose churches these sacraments are valid [emphasis added].

§3 Catholic ministers may lawfully administer the sacraments of penance, the Eucharist, and anointing of the sick to members of the Eastern churches not in full communion with the Catholic Church, if they spontaneously ask for them and are properly disposed. The same applies to members of other churches which the Apostolic See judges to be in the same position as the aforesaid Eastern churches so far as the sacraments are concerned.

§4 If there is a danger of death or if, in the judgement of the diocesan bishop or of the episcopal conference, there is some other grave and pressing need, Catholic ministers may lawfully administer these same sacraments to other Christians not in full communion with the Catholic Church, who cannot approach a minister of their own community and who spontaneously ask for them, provided that they demonstrate the Catholic faith in respect of these sacraments and are properly disposed [emphasis added].

§5 In respect of the cases dealt with in §2, 3, and 4, the diocesan bishop or the episcopal conference is not to issue general norms except after consultation with the competent authority, at least at the local level, of the non-Catholic church or community concerned.

Given the importance of access to the sacraments by all those duly permitted and properly disposed to receive them, Catholic and non-Catholic alike, I do not think it is unreasonable to recommend that priests and deacons memorize this canon and the USCCB's Guidelines. Or, if memorization is impossible, clergy can print out both the canon and the Guidelines on the front and back of a laminated card and keep it on their person at all times, as police officers do with The Miranda Warning.

Publish the guidelines. The missalettes used in many American Catholic parishes often print the USCCB's Guidelines, usually on the inside front cover. If a parish uses a missalette that has the USCCB's Guidelines available, great. If not, then contact the USCCB and request permission to reprint the Guidelines onto card stock to create a sturdy insert that can be placed inside all of the parish's missalettes. Extras can be placed in the parish's literature racks.

Promote the guidelines. Once a parish has determined where its copies of the Guidelines are—whether they are already printed in the parish missalettes or are printed by the parish on card stock and placed in the missalettes—the parish can create a plan of action for promoting the Guidelines at liturgies where non-Catholics are expected to be present. For example, a regular announcement before Masses offered at Christmas, Easter, and for weddings and funerals can be to direct the congregation's attention to the Guidelines and ask the congregation to read the Guidelines before the liturgy begins. For example:

Before we begin, we would like to direct your attention to the Guidelines for Reception of Communion, which can be found on the inside front-cover of the missalettes placed in the pew pockets in front of you. Please take a moment to read the Guidelines so that you may properly discern whether or not you are able to receive Communion during this liturgy. We welcome all who are unable to receive Communion to offer silent prayer or personal reflection during the Rite of Communion.

Nota bene: The announcement suggested here (my own wording, which may be revised appropriately at the discretion of clergy) is not an open call to receive Communion, nor does it make assumptions about who is properly disposed to receive. It simply directs all present to read the Church's guidelines for receiving Communion and to discern their own preparedness for reception. No assumptions are made about the personal religious convictions of those visiting, some of whom may either not be comfortable praying in common with Christians or may not even be theists (which is why the invitation to "personal reflection" is extended).

When the Church's guidelines are not heeded

Despite all of these precautions, there may be times when someone who in not properly disposed to receive Communion receives Communion anyway. It is more likely that a layperson will notice this than will a member of the clergy.

Clergy have the authority to counsel people not to receive Communion; laypersons have the authority to make the guidelines for receiving Communion known. In a previous blog post, I offered these suggestions to laity concerned about the proper reception of Communion by non-practicing Catholics or non-Catholics:

Bottom line: We must accept that human persons have free will, and may freely choose to use it either positively or negatively. We can offer information. When we have the authority to do so, we can counsel accordingly. In a few individual cases, it may be that ecclesial authorities can take more drastic steps to protect the Blessed Sacrament from unworthy reception.

But there is only so much we can do to inform, counsel, and instruct. In the end, ultimate responsibility for worthy reception of Communion belongs to the individual communicant. We can trust that God knows that communicant's mind and heart, and that he will respond to that person accordingly.

In order that this judgment [by the Lord] be favorable or rather that I be not judged at all, I want to be charitable in my thoughts toward others at all times, for Jesus has said, "Judge not, and you shall not be judged" (St. Therese of Lisieux).



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Religion & Culture; Worship
KEYWORDS: catholicanswers; catholicapologetics; communionline; holycommunion; michellearnold; noncatholics; wannabecatholics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last

1 posted on 04/15/2015 1:38:52 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; GregB; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; Ronaldus Magnus; tiki; Salvation; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 04/15/2015 1:39:26 PM PDT by NYer ("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Non-Catholics in the Communion Line

If you are not a member of that faith, (Catholic or otherwise) don't join the line.

People really should learn church visitor manners.

3 posted on 04/15/2015 1:42:44 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Staunch rules, which is good. A sharp delineation between Catholic and non-Catholic is critical.

However, how about denying communion to baby-killers and sodomites in your ranks, even though “Catholic?”


4 posted on 04/15/2015 1:43:02 PM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
However, how about denying communion to baby-killers and sodomites in your ranks, even though “Catholic?”

That's exactly what I was wondering.

5 posted on 04/15/2015 1:46:44 PM PDT by Legatus (I think, therefore you're out of your mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
However, how about denying communion to baby-killers and sodomites in your ranks...

That's a question that probably lingers in the minds of every Catholic who is neither a baby-killer nor a sodomite.

6 posted on 04/15/2015 1:47:39 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer
I am a lapsed Catholic, but respect the church's rules on communion when I attend a mass with my mother; that is, I abstain from communion.

But my sister - also basically a lapsed Catholic - and her husband - a Protestant - ALWAYS receive communion on these occasions. I guess it comes down to who has a sense of entitlement and who doesn't.
7 posted on 04/15/2015 1:54:44 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

The Orthodox Churches are not Catholic, but may receive. The delineation is not so clear. The Catholic Church won’t lump those Orthodox Churches that have apostolic descent with Protestants and such; they aren’t regarded as heresies.

In my county here in NJ we just had a regional bishop host a Protestant she-bishop speak at his parish; I can’t believe he can expect anyone to respect any Church guidelines at all after that...


8 posted on 04/15/2015 1:54:59 PM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Here is 1917 Code of Canon Law (Canon 731)regarding non-Catholics receiving communion:

It is forbidden to administer the sacraments of the Church to heretics or schismatics, even though they err in good faith and ask for them, unless they have first renounced their errors and been reconciled with the Church.

The new 1983 Canon Law is a direct result of the new ecclesiology of Vatican II. It is a radical departure from the Church's Traditional Law and Teaching.

9 posted on 04/15/2015 1:57:16 PM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
However, how about denying communion to baby-killers and sodomites in your ranks, even though “Catholic?”

And don't forget the divorced, remarried as well.

10 posted on 04/15/2015 1:59:41 PM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer
...the less-common announcement that "Communion is reserved to practicing Catholics in a state of grace" also is problematic.

How so?

11 posted on 04/15/2015 2:06:07 PM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
However, how about denying communion to baby-killers and sodomites in your ranks, even though “Catholic?”

As a strongly pro-life, Trinitarian Christian I would hate to get in the way of baby-killers and sodomites!


12 posted on 04/15/2015 2:06:35 PM PDT by Gamecock (Why do bad things happen to good people? That only happened once, and He volunteered. R.C. Sproul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Judas was at the last supper.


13 posted on 04/15/2015 2:12:09 PM PDT by PJammers (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Heck, NYer, non-Catholics are IN the Church, now. Some are cardinals.

Priests consciously accommodate liberality all the time, usually in the form of non-Catholics, by their consistent laxity and failure to shepherd the people present, failing to care who it is that receives our Lord, purposely avoiding their charge of competency to teach, and reinforce Church teachings.

In the Mass, the priest is responsible for those present, to inform them and to be vigilant.


14 posted on 04/15/2015 2:12:20 PM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; fwdude
As a strongly pro-life, Trinitarian Christian I would hate to get in the way of baby-killers and sodomites!

Because we all know that no pro-abort Democrat Catholic politician has ever received communion, or maybe even a funeral mass from the hand of a Catholic Bishop.

Ever.

15 posted on 04/15/2015 2:14:44 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

A picture is worth a thousand words!


16 posted on 04/15/2015 2:16:33 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Remember when President Clinton received Holy Communion in Africa, and said he knew more about Catholic teaching than the Pope or the Bishop.


17 posted on 04/15/2015 2:26:51 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Very rude. But then it was Clinton.
18 posted on 04/15/2015 2:33:21 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

I find it odd that people who do not believe in the real presence of the Eucharist would want to partake... what is the point? What is the feeling of entitlement? Look at me I can ingest a piece of meaningless bread? Is it to mock those who do believe?

I have wondered if perhaps it is a feeling of feeling left out by having to stay in the pew while others go up to receive. Priests however will give you a blessing if you approach them with your arms crossed in front of you. Incidentally many Catholics do this when they feel they are not in a state of grace to receive.


19 posted on 04/15/2015 2:33:43 PM PDT by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PJammers

Yes and what did Jesus say about him? It would have been better for him had he never been born. Clearly, we would all rather not be referred to in this manner by God.


20 posted on 04/15/2015 2:35:56 PM PDT by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson