You mean you were not judging others in stating, "Must be the season for uptight anti-catholics to bash the church " simply due to 4 posts stating Scriptural denial of the Catholic priesthood (the only "shoving Scripture" without an argument was done by a RC) and one calling it a pagan church due to that fact?
Did he not say, when I was a child, I spake as a child? Did Jesus not say to let the children come to Him?
And children sometimes touch hot stoves, and should learn from it. When you jump into combat and proceed to condemn one side for firing back at the latest example of false teaching - this one that of making the apostles and NT presbuteros into being the non-existent separate class of NT believers distinctively titiled "priests" ("hiereus”) - then it is you who are only a child in a hot kitchen acting like a veteran, and got burned by your presumptuous action.
Here is the remedy: Brethren, be not children in understanding: howbeit in malice be ye children, but in understanding be men. (1 Corinthians 14:20)
Follow your link; that wasn't my post.
"Pagan" is name-calling, as is "cult", and some of the other, worse names we get called as Catholics. I may not have written what was in the link you cited from Mercat, but, considering the immediacy of the contradictions, the choice of words and the sources, I would have to agree with the poster. Other than the first two posts, i.e. the article itself and the author's ping, it took two posts to get a negative response.
I'm Roman Catholic. We call them priests. I believe what the Church's translations say.