Posted on 03/25/2015 8:38:04 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The upcoming National Geographic miniseries "Killing Jesus," which is based on Fox News commentator Bill O'Reilly's bestselling book of the same name, tells the story of the historical Jesus and leaves the supernatural claims made by believers out of the equation.
The approach to the film was intentional, according to some of the actors in the film who believe it will help to get the Jesus story out to those who are skeptics.
Chris Ryman, who plays Malchus, the Roman guard who arrests Jesus before His crucifixion, commented on the film's portrayal of Jesus — the man — in the film.
"This is the first time we see Jesus as the man, not as this kind of spiritual divinity," Ryman told The Christian Post on Monday before the film's New York City premiere. "Even though all that is there — and I think that's important, because the main teachings about Jesus was to teach men how you could become better."
He continued: "If you look at this person and you see an angel or a God, you're not going to be able to relate to it. But if you see a man with all His faculties you say, 'Wow, He's like me.' He's a working class intelligent man. Every person can see something in them that Jesus has. That's what you're going to get from this story. The real human side of Jesus."
Ryman also told CP that when he first received the script for "Killing Jesus," he wasn't told that Jesus' miracles wouldn't be depicted in the film. He further admitted that while the entirety of Jesus' story can't be told without acknowledging the supernatural aspects of His life, it can be achieved without the use of Hollywood special effects that are often found in other portrayals of Jesus' life.
Alexis Rodney, who plays Simon Peter in "Killing Jesus," elaborated more on Ryman's point.
"In a lot of other versions you see lights and rays, and that's fine — it serves its purpose," he told CP. "But again [what we're bringing that's different], I think, is being able to make it slightly more ambiguous. You draw in a larger audience who will then get the core message."
Joe Doyle, who plays Judas Iscariot in the film, feels the ambiguity could be viewed as a positive and leaves the decision as to whether Jesus is really God or not in the viewers' hands.
"It's portrayed exactly that, it's ambiguous, but it leaves the question open whether it could be coincidence, which can be construed as miracle as well," Doyle told CP.
Ryman also supports the film's approch and believes it will help expose non-believers to the message of Christ. He also discussed the subtle way the miracles are displayed in the film without them being overtly supernatural or religious.
"When I read [the script], for me, I was like, well, it's smart, because it's obviously meant to be for the non-believers as much as it is for the believers. But for me, there's clear points where I'm like, well, that's clearly a miracle. What's happening there — that can only be a miracle. It's very clever," Ryman continued.
Speaking about the film's non-traditional approach in telling the story of Jesus' life, Rodney explained to CP that he believes younger generations might be more open to learning about Jesus' message. "Especially with the younger generation who are far more skeptical and savvy. If they are to find the beauty within this message, I think that they need this approach."
"Killing Jesus" premiers on the National Geographic channel on Sunday, March 29.
If so, the man is on his way to hell and hoping to take some others with him.
That is the goal of satan and Ted is acting as his agent.
Does this make Bill O’Reilly a CINO?
In my book, it does.
[[ He said it would show the audience why Jesus was really killed]]
Psssst- Mr pseudo-Christian oreilly, Jesus was killed because HE ALLOWED HIMSELF TO BE KILLED because the world needed a savior- Perhaps you should take him up on his offer Bill because obviously you aren’t one of His if you think Jesus was killed by mere mortals and couldn’t have stopped it if He wished to do so!
His death had EVERYTHING to do religion!
oreilley’s book basically claims Jesus was a ‘good guy’ and ‘role model’ because He was someone who picked himself up by his bootstraps and made soemthign of His life,
And he claism the ‘real reason’ that Jesus was killed was because Jesus interrupted the tax flow from the temple to the roman empire when he overturned the money changer’s tables- He claims rome saw Him as a ‘rabble rouser’ who was upset over taxes
And, he claism the reason the Jews were awaiting Jesus was because they were tired of paying taxes and thought Jesus would free them from government taxes-
Oreilly is clueless!
Relying on that self-satisfied balloon, Bill O’Reilly, for a discussion about Jesus is about as useful as trusting Valerie Jarrett with your wallet.
RE: And he claism the ‘real reason’ that Jesus was killed was because Jesus interrupted the tax flow from the temple to the roman empire when he overturned the money changer’s tables- He claims rome saw Him as a ‘rabble rouser’ who was upset over taxes
WOW, an ancient version of a Tea Party candidate, who woulda thunk !! /sarc
RE: could it be that a mooselim was cast in the lead role ...intentionally?
And why would a Muslim accept the role ( unless he isn’t really serious about his faith )? The Quran states that Jesus DID NOT DIE on the cross.
He is likely what would be referred to as a Nominal muslim.
The sot that only “attends” mosque...on Ramadan...and...”like that”..
In terms of his adherence to the “faith”.. he could have habits very SImilar to Nominal Christians who attend Church only on Easter and Christmas.
Why the producer cast him..in the Role of Jesus is indeed curious
"And my speech and my preaching were not with persuasive words of human wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power, that your faith should not be in the wisdom of men but in the power of God." 1 Cor 2:4-5.
O'Reilly has clearly said he believes in salvation is by works, so this doesn't surprise me.
Making a Jesus movie to show during Easter week but targeting mostly non-believers. Genius!
I remember several years ago, O'Blowhard was doing a segment that involved Jesus. I don't remember what it was about, maybe homosexuality and the church. One of the guests mentioned to O'Reilly that Jesus had once said "Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. And a person’s enemies will be those of his own household". O'Reilly actually disputed that Jesus had ever said any such thing. He said "Jesus was the Prince of Peace!"
IMO, O'Reilly doesn't know squat about the bible or Jesus. He doesn't write his books anyway. This movie sounds just like the sort of uninformed crap one can expect from O'Reilly.
SPOILER ALERT: - at the end He dies.
Yep, that's the thing----the HUGE thing---O'Reilly misses. No one could "kill" the Lord unless He willingly allowed it. He sacrificed Himself for us.
His own testimony is that he is a CINO.....he said he believe’s that God will accept him because his good works outweigh his bad works............
He and all who believe this are in for a huge shock - but it’s not like they haven’t heard the true gospel......they just reject it.
I guess the resurrection is too supernatural for this version.
Bill O'Reilly: poster child for the proverb "a little learning is a dangerous thing."
Bill O'Reilly: poster child for the proverb "a little learning is a dangerous thing."
I saw a bit of O’riley on the 4xladies at noon on Fox news. I didn’t hear what was being discussed but with him sitting there, in the middle, my thought was “4 babes & a boob.” O’R being the boob.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.