[af_vet_1981]

You never did answer the question of why this point of order is so important to you. But there seems to be a compulsion to intimidate other FReepers to agree with your assessment of the status of Mary the mother of Jesus. Why does this matter in regards to one’s salvation from sin and the second death?

1. In post 655, after declining to confess that Mary is the woman of Isaiah who was to call her son Immanuel, you called this an inquisition and asked to be left alone. I agreed to your request in post 659 and have not responded to you again until now, when you have posted four more times after asking to be left alone.
2. You posted to me in 664 asking a question and describing me as conniving, which may be defined as "given to or involved in conspiring to do something immoral, illegal, or harmful."
3. post 667 with a superstitious comment about the number 666
4. post 687 with a request to find a way to undo what you did, or failed to do, with respect to a Isaiah and Matthew texts
5. post 749 complaining I am not answering you and again bringing up the topic of your decision not to confess that Mary is mother of Immanuel referenced from Isaiah and Matthew.

Is this your way of asking for a second chance to confess that Mary is the mother of Immanuel ?

[Resettozero]

So, you bypass an honest response to my questions while insisting I answer your trick question about by belief regarding whether Mary is the mother of God. Repeatedly, I’ve denied to say more than “Mary is the mother of Jesus” and to ask why this matter is of such importance to you.

Yes, you have exhibited a tendency toward deviousness in the wording of your demands that someone, anyone on this thread, consent to voluntarily be ensnared by your stupid, contrived question, which you continue to modify and which I’ve repeatedly declined to answer.

It’s a shifting-sand line of questioning that produces nothing edifying to anyone here, other than yourself perhaps.

Why is this matter so important to you?