[rwa265]

I didn’t ask for your logic.

---

I know what you are asking. What I am asking is how can you deny that Mary is the mother of God incarnate when scripture very clearly describes Mary as giving birth to the Word made flesh, the only Son of the Father, Jesus Christ, who is to be called the Son of God?

What is your logic if not Nestorianism?

[Resettozero]

What I am asking is how can you deny that Mary is the mother of God incarnate...

Your not the first RC throughout FR RF history to beat this decaying horse. And for what purpose, to what end, other than to continue to venerate Mary and RCC "saints" above other Christians...is never explained.

Want to explain why this matters so much to you, even though Mary to mother of Jesus NEVER is referred to as Mother of God in the NT?

Have you considered the Holy Spirit may have a reason it just isn't said that way?

[CynicalBear]

>>What I am asking is how can you deny that Mary is the mother of God<<

I have answered that multiple times already. The Holy Spirit did NOT use the term "mother of God". I have no doubt He knew what He was doing. For man to change the words the Holy Spirit used is beyond audacious.

>>What is your logic if not Nestorianism?<<

Ah yes! There we have one of those coined terms of some men who thought they could understand fully the natures of Christ and it's implications and workings. Preposterous!

Going beyond what the Holy Spirit inspired to be written is akin to playing God. Claiming knowledge not clearly revealed in scripture is blasphemous and anyone engaging in it risks the wrath of God.