Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o

I’m a little surprised that Elton John is the one who flew off the handle at this. I saw him quoted not that long ago as having been made sad by the realization that his child (children?) would never have a mother as he himself had.

I think there are a lot of homeless children in this world and one would be better off to adopt them that to go to all these great lengths.


9 posted on 03/21/2015 4:41:41 PM PDT by jocon307 (Tell it like it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jocon307

I too was a little surprised that Elton John did this. I think one of the problems is that entertainers who might have been quietly gay once upon a time now feel that their public expects them to prove their bona fides by attacking non-gays.


13 posted on 03/21/2015 4:57:53 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: jocon307

The desire to have one’s biological children is inherent in all animals. The difference with humans is that if one cannot have one naturally, there are other ways to do so.

The problem, like with these children, is parents who don’t always consider the life long ramifications of the methods they use to have a child.

I understand Elton’s desire, but at what cost to the child? What price will these children pay for a need that could not be filled in a natural and as these girls said, complimenary sexual relationship?


22 posted on 03/22/2015 7:42:46 PM PDT by Jvette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson