I haven’t seen anything corrected.
So far it looks like the belief that the head of your denomination can receive messages from God and is infallible in giving them to you, is something that you don’t believe in, except on a case by case deal, after you or others agree that he didn’t make that one up.
For instance in your case, you wait for the committee to decide on each infallible statement and whether they call BS on him or not, except for saints, for saints, you just don’t believe in his infallibility at all, is that correct?
It's not correct. You're incorrigible. Over and out.