On this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3120992/posts
[and others]
You outed yourself as a follower and respecter of the teachings of the cultist Rood. The whole thread is worth reading for anyone unfamiliar with the cultic teachings of Michael Rood.
anyone interested in editor-surveyor’s view of Rood can view this link: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3120992/posts?page=158#158
For this reason and because you denied it earlier, I take back my apology for linking you with the cultic teachings of Rood and Rood himself. There is obviously a link there.
This began because I pointed out that you were associated with Rood. You denied it.
Was your post a lie? It appears to.
In any case, I reinstate my ealier comments to verga that you are involved in a cultic heresy - in this case a fraud.
Your post in answer to mine was false. This is noted. I hope others who were unaware of your affiliations now have a context to evaluate your posts.
Most already knew. But people have been known to change their minds. Perhaps he has.