| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 02/25/2015 3:29:26 PM PST by Jim Robinson, reason:
childishness |
Posted on 02/20/2015 12:33:03 PM PST by RnMomof7
Yeah, a dissident priest.....wrong then, wrong now, wrong forever.
When I was a Baptist, I was taught that the little cup of grape juice symbolized Jesus' Blood. Why, do you suppose, the Baptists would be promoting a "symbol" of a sinful practice?
Scripture, which your Cult claims to have written, does not in one shred support Romish teachings. I've pointed out multiple times instances where the Catechism of the Catholic Cult contradicts scripture.
My statement may have been gratuitous... however, it doesn't change the FACT that Roman Catholic Cultism is bilge. It is bereft of theological support. It's a lie. A False Gospel.
Hoss
There is a LOT of that confusion all over the RF.
I think you've hit the nail on the head. Think about the puritanism that American Protestantism came from, what a gloomy bunch of haters they must have been. Their spiritual descendents are merely holding fast to their traditions.
Heil Marys? LOL When did Mary become Hitler? And I can’t even walk forward all that will with this polio! Now backwards? Sure glad I follow Jesus alone! He simply said “your sins are forgiven”!
Nope. Guess again.
Guess again....O.K., without an inerrant leader, we all get to decide on what the truth is...yeah, that'll work real well....20,000 or so different ideas of what the truth is should lead to no confusion whatsoever.....I guess....PATHETIC
There is no accounting for error. Error is error no matter where you find it. Jesus still would have been sinning by eating blood and encouraging others to do so. They were after all Jews and still under the old laws. Do you serve a Jesus that sinned?
Uhhh....Christians partake in His divinity every moment through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit by Who we've been sealed in Him.
Nope...doesn't work that way...Transubstantiation is what Christ meant, taught, and instituted. The bread and wine become the Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity of Christ.....He said "THIS IS MY BODY"....and it is.
“...It makes no sense to me...”
I also made a similar point as well on another thread. Why go for the throat of your fellow Christians when they are being beheaded?
The Catholic belief in the real presence need not be attacked - let us believe in peace and we have history and scripture to back us up, as well.
Would the virulent condemnation of Jewish belief (attack for not beliving in Jesus) be appropriate? Of course not. Attacking Christian’s core beliefs when people are dying for the faith is not OK.
Why do you care? Let Catholics be Catholic in peace. Trying to undermine someone else’s beliefs with lies is not Christian.
The Church Fathers ALL taught the real presence of Christ in the eucharist. They were not the precursors of the protestants; they had nothing to protest.
According to protestants, doctrine does not develop, so the whole premise is already just an attack, they don’t even really believe it themselves.
St. John Henry Newman ora pro nobis
St. Francis de Sales ora pro nobis
It has happened for you - NOT for Christ who lives in the eternal present.
For Christ, His sacrifice is happening NOW because to Him ther is no past, no future - only His eternal NOW!
AMDG
You are aware that Jesus has risen? Right?
He is at the right hand of the Father....right now....at this moment. His sacrifice was completed on the cross.
I thought that pretty much every one of the myriad denominations practiced some fairly standard form of observing the Lord’s Supper. So, they are ALL wrong?
You did not answer the question, so I will restate it. Why are churches telling people to participate in symbolizing a sinful act?
I understood your question exactly but am sorry your understanding what “God exists outside if space and time” means is lacking.
And since the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are ONE - the Trinity does not exist separately - ever.
For the Greater Glory of God
“... Ian Paisley wing...”
Yes - I said that also on another thread and I am surprised it is allowed because they don’t allow Jack Chick.
Would they allow such an attack on Judaism? Maybe this religion forum has seen its better day.
Ian Paisley and these attacks are Al Sharpton personified - hatefulled catholic baiters
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.