You have to understand that Iscool has one mode of argumentation: He/she/it dreams up an ignoble motive for anything any Catholic has reportedly said or done.
Everything any priest has ever said on any topic was motivated by 1) greed, or 2) the desire to molest little boys.
Having pointed out this obvious truth, Iscool sits back and enjoys the warm glow of victory.
“One mode” you say!!! And then ascribe to him what that “one mode” is. How omniscient of you!