Eveidently someone can`t read Hebrew, latin and NT greek here, and it ain`t me.
I like that expert translators in those languages can just decide Joshua was a perfect substitution for the Greco/roman/Latin name Jesus in Acts 7:45 and Hebrews 4:8
And that change has occurred in 400 years since the 1599 Geneva bible came out.. I never would have seen that without that bible and a concordance that showed no ‘Joshua’s in the new testament..
And now, translations have given us two.. and they replaced the sacred name Jesus in two spots.
Maybe the name Jesus is also just a roman tradition if translators can take the Greek and do no translation work.. just sort of look to the old testament English transliteration and delete Jesus in two spots..