Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna

This pope had been his patron, and despite his knowledge, Galileo was in many respects a blustering fool. Bellarmine, who had protected him, tried to warn him not assert what few educated men of his time believed, which was that mathematics was a true measure of things in general.


31 posted on 02/10/2015 9:43:35 PM PST by RobbyS (quotes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS
Unfortunately for your thesis, the "blustering fool" was correct, and the "educated" clerics were mistaken.

It took a century and a half for the "educated" Romanists to slink off, tails between their legs, and quietly remove his book from the Index.

By then, of course, they were nothing more than a laughing stock. It took 3½ centuries for the highly "educated" Church of Rome to [sort of] apologize. Unfortunately, during all of those three hundred and fifty years, the "fool" was correct and the highly "educated" clerics of the Vatican, who believed mumbojumbo was a substitute for mathematics, science, and reason were ... completely, utterly, and, dare I say infallibly ... WRONG.

If Galileo was a "fool" what does that make the Magisterium?

61 posted on 02/11/2015 7:52:11 PM PST by FredZarguna (O, Reason not the need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson