Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: CatherineofAragon

And you have consistently avoided the fact that Christ spoke in Aramaic and that changes your interpretation of Matthew 16:18.


79 posted on 02/08/2015 8:59:49 AM PST by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: piusv

Still avoiding those verses?


83 posted on 02/08/2015 9:04:21 AM PST by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: piusv
And you have consistently avoided the fact that Christ spoke in Aramaic and that changes your interpretation of Matthew 16:18.

So did the writers of scripture translate it into Greek on their own or did Jesus instruct them to do it???

And which dialect of Aramaic did Jesus speak??? There were about a thousand of them...

And why didn't the Aramaic to Greek translators write,

Thou are petra and upon this petra I will build my church???

THIS is the Latin that Jerome translated into the Vulgate:

18 et ego dico tibi quia tu es Petrus et super hanc petram aedificabo ecclesiam meam et portae inferi non praevalebunt adversum eam

You might want to notice that Jerome used two differnt words for rock instead of one...Isn't it odd that Jerome didn't bother with the 'original Aramaic'???

I don't believe your argument has an ounce of merit...

135 posted on 02/08/2015 11:52:44 AM PST by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson