[FourtySeven]

And as I told Arthur, I am not trying to change your mind - just allow others to see the flaws in your argument and tradition.

You may think you are doing that but you aren't. As anyone who wishes can read the article on catholic.com and see for themselves that you still haven't shown how what is said THERE, is wrong.

Is Jesus' command to drink his blood a violation of God's law?

For those who wish to see for themselves how your reply lacks.

[CynicalBear]

The site you sent us to uses the passage from Mark 7:19. Would you please show where God EVER said that blood was considered food? Also please explain why if Jesus said all foods were clean, which they try to include blood, did the apostles by the Holy Spirit prohibit the eating of blood again in Acts 15.

In their second point the use the quote from scripture ""These are only a shadow of what is to come, but the substance belongs to Christ. Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in questions of food and drink". Now please once again, explain why the apostles by the Holy Spirit do just that with their prohibition against eating blood in Acts 15.

In there next point they try to include blood in the statement by Paul about eating meat offered to idols. Paul didn't include blood in his statement.

Jesus was born under the law and any breaking of those commands would have been sin.