Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Arthur McGowan
The absence of any relics of Mary is an ANOMALY. It sticks out like a sore thumb. Given the early Christians’ devotion to the relics of all those who were close to Jesus on earth, the absence of relics of Mary demands an explanation.

The need to have no relics of Mary to *prove* her *assumption* is plenty enough reason to hide them.

if there were relics of Mary, it would blow the whole assumption of Mary schtick to pieces.

As long as the church wants to perpetuate that myth, then no relics will ever be found.

Thus, in a Catholic's eyes, making that *proof* that Mary was assumed.

It's not merely circular logic, it's a black hole of logic from which there is no hope of reason ever escaping.

377 posted on 01/23/2015 12:41:26 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies ]


To: metmom

But why didn’t anyone speak up in defense of the “truth” that Mary died and was buried?

Not one of the apostles, not one of the Apostolic Fathers or the next generation or the next or the next.

None of them attacked this FRAUD of the Assumption. Nobody.

Your theory is, then, that all of the apostles, and Paul, and the entire next generation, and the next, and the next, were fraudsters.

The entire Christian church was fraudsters.

And yet you take the Scriptures that these fraudsters wrote and assembled seriously?


397 posted on 01/23/2015 4:41:09 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson