Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Martin Luther King Was a Crusader but Was He a Christian?
Don Boys' Common Sense for Today News ^ | January 12, 2015 | Dr. Don Boys

Posted on 01/17/2015 8:59:40 PM PST by John Leland 1789

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: warsaw44

Hey, easy now warsaw. I’m Christian and I don’t hate your guts. As a matter of fact, the reason I take time to say things sometimes and try to point to the truth is because I care about my fellow man and woman.

I’m an ex soldier with probably not a lot of tact, but I don’t hate.

I do admit I struggle with moslems.


61 posted on 01/18/2015 3:58:14 AM PST by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver; .45 Long Colt

“Sitting on this side of the pearly gates and proclaiming to know whether any person is in heaven is an indication the author doesn’t know what he’s talking about.”

No, we cannot determine what any individual’s state is regarding salvation at the time of their death. BUT we do know the criteria from the Bible. If someone does not meet those criteria, then hell is their destination. That is not judging or condemning on the part of the Christian - it is merely invoking Scripture.


62 posted on 01/18/2015 3:59:11 AM PST by Diapason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Cry if I Wanna

MLK was a communist fraud. The black community worships him like he’s Jesus or something is sad.Watch and learn.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IShbhepwieA


63 posted on 01/18/2015 4:24:22 AM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice
In point of fact, the Church did take this position—that the universe revolved around the Earth

The Church did not take this position because geocentrism was in the Bible, because it is not in the Bible. The Church took this position because it was in the writings of Aristotle, and in the middle ages, Aristotle was the next best thing to, well, Jesus, and so anything Aristotle said HAD to be correct, however boneheaded it happened to be.

As C. S. Lewis put it, whenever you start promoting "Christianity and," whatever comes after the "and" eventually becomes more important to you than the Christianity--and that would be true whether the "and" were Aristotle, as it was throughout much of the last millennium, or social justice, as it was with King, and is essentially with all Christian progressivists before, during, and after King.

And one more thing...

Parthenogenesis (where an offspring develops from an unfertilized egg) occurs in certain species, but not in mammals. Period.

But the Bible doesn't claim that Jesus developed from an unfertilized egg. It claims that Jesus was born of a virgin. It has nothing to say about the physical aspects of the conception: one either accepts it was an act of divine intervention, or one does not.

64 posted on 01/18/2015 4:51:05 AM PST by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen; warsaw44
According to most people on this site all the Catholics are not Christian.

I cannot speak for "most people." I can only speak for myself, as an LCMS Lutheran. I have doctrinal differences with Catholicism--if I didn't, I would be a Catholic--but I do not assume that because a person is Catholic that somehow makes it impossible for him/her to be a Christian. On the contrary, if someone claims to be a Christian, my only two questions are, do you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus Christ, and do you believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead. Answer yes to both, and you have my hand of Christian fellowship.

Now here's where the problem lies for me with the original topic of this thread, MLK. The Bible, in the Romans passage hinted at above, says that you are saved if you believe in Jesus' resurrection. The Bible also says, in I Cor. 15 among other places, that not believing in the resurrection is a bonehead thing, because not believing in Jesus' resurrection logically leads to not believing in our resurrection, which removes the main incentive to accept Jesus' salvation. The Bible does not say, however, that a person who does not believe in Jesus' resurrection is thereby damned: "stupid" and "damned" are not mutually reflexive (for which I daily thank God, but I digress). Salvation is a divine act, made available by the blood of Jesus shed on the cross, and it is quite possible that someone could accept Jesus' offer of salvation, and still be stupid enough to not believe Jesus' resurrection, or His offer of resurrection for His people--whether that would be sufficient for salvation is a deeper theological question than I have time for this morning, as I prepare to go to church, read the Scripture, and play the pipe organ :-)

65 posted on 01/18/2015 5:04:18 AM PST by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

bump


66 posted on 01/18/2015 5:21:41 AM PST by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789
Maureen Dowd may give us an insight to why Hollywood snubbed "Selma".

Seems, the move Selma trashes Liberial icon, LJB, as an obstructionist to MLK's civil rights movement.

67 posted on 01/18/2015 5:40:15 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #68 Removed by Moderator

To: John Leland 1789

Many in worldly leadership, and even in Church leadership, profess to be Christians but might not be. Ultimately that’s only for God to say, but Christians do have an obligation to point out heresy. I’m not sure, however, that everyone who voices some heresy is a heretic. Some people might be mistaken or ignorant on some point and unknowingly embrace a heresy. Since the Lord is always better training us, as Jesus did with the disciples, who jumped to many wrong conclusions (their situation being a little different though since the Gospel hadn’t yet been so fully revealed), we’re always having errors in our understanding corrected. True heresy would seem to be a knowing rebellion against what one knows and understands to be God’s Word.


69 posted on 01/18/2015 6:36:40 AM PST by Faith Presses On
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789
I was 11 when he was shot, and even then he was known as a communist sympathizer.

Considering we were in the full blown cold war mode, he never was, is , or will be a hero in my book.

70 posted on 01/18/2015 6:39:22 AM PST by catfish1957 (Everything I needed to know about Islam was written on 11 Sep 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

“Jesus isn’t an accountant, and if MLK didn’t do enough, then no one can.”

Truly. Jesus is NOT an accountant, and no one can do enough!

“And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up, 15 that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life. 16 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. 17 For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.

18 “He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.” - Jesus


71 posted on 01/18/2015 6:59:38 AM PST by Mr Rogers (Can you remember what America was like in 2004?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

“What is a “good work”? “

“Then they said to Him, “What shall we do, that we may work the works of God?”

Jesus answered and said to them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent.”” - John 6


72 posted on 01/18/2015 7:02:21 AM PST by Mr Rogers (Can you remember what America was like in 2004?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

It’s about time! And I’m afraid since King’s time (or before) the exact same thing can be said about the vast majority of Black “ministers”—even in the rural South!


73 posted on 01/18/2015 7:06:18 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Throne and Altar! [In Jerusalem!!!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I can't believe some of the stuff people are posting on this thread. MLK was not in any sense of the word an orthodox chrstian.. He rejected all the supernatural doctrines. He was basically a follower of J*sus the moral philosopher rather than a worshiper of J*sus the demigxd.

And judging by the replies on this thread, so are most FReepers!

74 posted on 01/18/2015 7:13:07 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Throne and Altar! [In Jerusalem!!!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

There are a lot of non-Christians posting here, obviously ... and ... that’s quite revealing to me!


75 posted on 01/18/2015 7:36:48 AM PST by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Cry if I Wanna
Based on his apparent beliefs, King was a flawed non-Christian.

Nope. You're wrong. He looks like a Christian to me. And I'm an expert. I suppose you're now gonna tell me the Pope isn't a Christian!!

YOU are wrong! He didn't believe the dogmas, therefore he wasn't an orthodox chrstian. Period.

Unless you want to re-define chrstianity as some sort of moral philosophy.

76 posted on 01/18/2015 7:38:55 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Throne and Altar! [In Jerusalem!!!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cry if I Wanna
He was imperfect but who isn’t?

He was an impenitent whoremonger. An adulterer. That's hardly an innocuous "imperfection."

77 posted on 01/18/2015 7:41:05 AM PST by LouAvul (If government is the answer, you're asking the wrong question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
So what is being said here - that for all he did, MLK is in hell, because even though he did so much for so many people, and showed so much courage in the face of evil that he was killed for it, he wasn’t perfect and didn’t fit the generally accepted definition of Christian, and so even though he invoked Christ in his mission to give heart to people and fight evil - he’s now in hell forever, suffering like the most vile criminal?

What utter, complete rot. I reject such a conclusion with contempt. Jesus isn’t an accountant, and if MLK didn’t do enough, then no one can. He faced the murderous equivalent of nazistic hate and responded with teaching millions a response of love and nonviolence and human dignity and calling on God. There’s not one in a hundred who could do what he did.

And lumping him in with LBJ is obscene.

I don’t care how the Left had abused his legacy and name for their own purposes - it doesn’t change what he did and taught. And if what he did and taught wasn’t Christian, then Christianity is useless.

Forget about where MLK's soul is. And forget about what he did, because that is irrelevant.

To be an orthodox chrstian one must believe the dogmas. He admitted he did not, therefore he was not an orthodox chrstian.

78 posted on 01/18/2015 7:41:22 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Throne and Altar! [In Jerusalem!!!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
Judge not, lest ye be judged.

Spoken like a true liberal!

This jackass has no business deciding whether or not MLK was a Christian. He professed it, and preached it. This article is basically garbage. Wonder how this guys life would look if someone gave it that same rectal exam?

MLK did not profess orthodox chrstianity! He denied the dogmas! Orthodox chrstianity is not a moral philosophy, like Gandhi's. It professes to be a supernatural religion. King rejected supernatural religion.

He was not an orthodox chrstian. His moral philosophy and accomplishments are completely irrelevant to the point being discussed.

79 posted on 01/18/2015 7:44:18 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Throne and Altar! [In Jerusalem!!!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

If he had been a faithful believer in Christ, I doubt he would be so popularized and emulated by unbelieving culture.


80 posted on 01/18/2015 7:45:50 AM PST by Cvengr ( Adversity in life & death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson