Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman
Yes, which is exactly why we can look to the NT to see how they were organized, and note that it doesn’t look much like the system Rome promotes today.

Episcopoi (bishops), presbuteroi (priests) and deaconoi (deacons); it looks pretty much like the Catholic Church to me.

Not from God, not from Christ, not from Scripture, but from the church. The church invented this distinction itself.

Just as the church established the office of deacon, something never mentioned by Jesus. The office of deacon was not established from Scripture. Acts only records what the church did with its own authority. The church exercised the authority given to it by Jesus Christ himself, an authority that it continues to exercise.

58 posted on 12/18/2014 1:25:48 PM PST by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Petrosius

“Episcopoi (bishops), presbuteroi (priests) and deaconoi (deacons); it looks pretty much like the Catholic Church to me.”

Multiple bishops for a city (who were all married)? Chosen by the members of the congregation? With no over-arching authority of the Pope above them? Presbyters, who were not accorded any priestly title or duties? That’s what the NT describes, and it doesn’t look much like the Catholic Church to me.

“Acts only records what the church did with its own authority. The church exercised the authority given to it by Jesus Christ himself, an authority that it continues to exercise.”

When that authority conflicts with Scripture, then its use is invalid, and must be rejected. The authority of the church only applies in matters where Scripture is silent, or leaves room for interpretation. It cannot overrule God.


60 posted on 12/18/2014 1:37:52 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson