Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: terycarl; metmom; Salvation; Mrs. Don-o; daniel1212; CynicalBear; Elsie
I don't, I was just pointing out that Mary could certainly have been protected from sin as was the FULLY HUMAN, CHRIST.

I'm still perplexed by this.

Catholicism's own apologists admit no scriptural support for this nor any support from the ECFs. These can be verified on the catholicencyclopediaonline.

It sounds like the catholic is working on a lot of "ifing" and "couldas". Something like this...."if Christ was sinless, couldn't God....".

To be honest God is capable of doing what He wills. However, He doesn't contradict Himself or His Word.

The evidence we do have in the Word completely goes against the immaculate conception.

So again I ask....what is the catholic appealing to?

Teaching learned in childhood?

They've always done it this way and it's hard to break the "habit"? (no pun there)

1,519 posted on 12/17/2014 4:23:56 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1518 | View Replies ]


To: ealgeone
The evidence we do have in the Word completely goes against the immaculate conception.

no it doesn't

1,596 posted on 12/17/2014 7:46:31 PM PST by terycarl ( common sense prevails over all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1519 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson