The same arguments which have been made for homosexual marriage, can and will be made for polygamy and group marriage.
I think the author is right. Those who have pushed to change the definition of marriage cannot be intellectually honest and oppose changing the definition to include more than two people.
It is now a mainstream view among the judges who are imposing homosexual marriage that it is discriminatory to limit people to an opposite sex partner. Its not a stretch that judges will also decide that not allowing polygamy is also discriminatory.
I would.point out that the reason we have so many states allowing homosexual marriage nowadays is due to activists judges. I would take issue with how widely accepted homosexual marriage has become. Only a handful of states went through the political process to change the definition of marriage.
When the day comes (it’ll happen by 2016, I think)....that in New Hampshire....a 45-year old lesbian will apply to marry a local 13-year old girl, with her mother’s consent (this is the legal deal that exists there)...the news media will sit there and finally start to ask some questions.
I do agree....polygamy is the next step and ought to be legalized somewhere within five years. There’s nothing logical anymore to prevent it.