Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Alex Murphy
"So he thinks it's only a scientific/legal problem?"

You honestly can't figure out what he's saying here? He's saying an ethic prohibiting abortion is not a distinctive "belief" of a Church based on faith in a supernatural source of revelation. If it were that, "Don't abort your children" would have the same status as, say, "Go to Mass on Sunday." It's something you could not credibly propose to somebody outside of your faith. You could not propose it to civil society.

But the prohibition on abortion is based on the verifiable human status of the victim of the act. An atheist can see that. Nat Hentoff can see that.

It has its religious aspects, to be sure. It has its philosophical aspects as well. But it is solidly rooted in Natural Law. Thus it can be required of one's fellow citizens in a State which still Constitutionally prohibits any "religious test."

Any other questions, Alex?

5 posted on 11/21/2014 12:35:02 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Sanity is the adequate response of the mind to the real thing: adaequatio mentis ad rem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o

I think *Thou shalt not murder* would cover it.

So, yes, there IS a religious prohibition.


7 posted on 11/21/2014 1:53:53 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Perhaps Pope Francis has too much faith in the mental acuity of his listeners.


9 posted on 11/21/2014 2:09:22 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson