Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Remember that Hitching Post gay wedding case? Yeah… never mind
http://hotair.com ^ | October 29, 2014 | Jazz Shaw

Posted on 10/30/2014 2:59:41 PM PDT by NKP_Vet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: NKP_Vet
Perhaps Americans should begin to reconsider the drive for total equality, political, social, religious, economic etc. When the gays get power they immediately attack anyone perceived as a threat to their governance(any normal person) See the lesbian Houston Texas mayor. Perhaps a repeal of the non-discrimination statutes is in order.

Remember: When everyone has "Rights" no one has Rights.

21 posted on 10/30/2014 4:00:52 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
Christians and common sense win one, but this is not the end of this garbage. The sodomite nazis will sue in Federal court. If a Federal judge rules for religious freedom, which is highly unlikely, and it goes to the Supreme Court, sodomites will get their wish.

Satan and his minions are hard at work, aren't they?

22 posted on 10/30/2014 4:17:16 PM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Meanwhile, my advice to the Knapps is to move the Hitching Post just outside the city limits.


23 posted on 10/30/2014 4:26:43 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Every time you say no to a liberal, you make the Baby Barack cry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

I think the “nattering nabobs” line was by Bill Safire.


24 posted on 10/30/2014 4:36:49 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Gay activists are so full of hate, they won’t stop here.

The smart ones drop these types of cases. Why? Because they *know* this will expose the lie that Churches even need to be registered as 501c3’s in the first place, they’re exempt. This “separation of Church and State” goes both ways, the State has no jurisdiction over the Church. The fact that they say the ordinance doesn’t specify profit vs non-profit is irrelevant, it doesn’t get to just trump the Constitution because an “ordinance” doesn’t differentiate. If Churches ever realize the power that would be unleashed by realizing they don’t have to pander to 501c3 status - it would be devastating to the left. Which is why they never push the issue of revoking the 501c3 status for political speech. They just threaten it. They never want to really challenge it because they know they’d lose.

Yet the activists will not be able to see beyond their own hatred. It consumes them. They will ultimately push to prosecute only to lose so badly the backlash will be something unimaginable (to them). The more they prosecute the less support they’ll get. People will see them for what they are.

These are troubling times we live in. All things must come to pass...you can let it disturb you, or, you can appreciate the privilege of living in these times and seeing history unfold - toward the end game. We will be persecuted...for doing nothing wrong and you will be righteous.


25 posted on 10/30/2014 4:57:38 PM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevem

“Liberals crave real, live civil war...the hot kind. “

They should be careful what they wish for. They may just get it.


26 posted on 10/30/2014 5:00:18 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Oh, I’m so relieved! /sarc


27 posted on 10/30/2014 6:09:27 PM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

The couple could sue in civil court.


28 posted on 10/30/2014 6:27:40 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (AGW-e is the climate "Domino Theory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

As recently as say ten years ago, marriage being a man and a woman was not a religious peculiarity. It was just the definition of a word.


29 posted on 10/31/2014 2:14:22 AM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

This is why we have to get out and vote for Republicans because the Senate determines the Supreme Court. We all know by now that the Democrats all take the vows to the PC gods and will not budge from the orders given to them from their higher ups, we cannot afford to risk having more liberal Supreme Court judges or Federal judges.


30 posted on 10/31/2014 9:19:23 PM PDT by cradle of freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

What standing in court do they have? They can still get married in the chapel, they just have to find a right thinking lesbian.


31 posted on 11/01/2014 7:40:02 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson