To: metmom
I did NOT say that if Mary had been sinless, she could not have died. What I said was this:Additionally, if she had been sinless, she would not have died. The wages of sin is death. If she died, it is proof positive that she had sinned, line 1 does not sem to agree with line 2 :I did not say that if Mary had been sinless, she could not have died......followed by if she had been sinless she would not have died
then you stated that if she died,it is proof positive that she had sinned
I merely pointed out that Jesus died is that also proof positive???
2,553 posted on
10/19/2014 6:30:05 PM PDT by
terycarl
(common sense prevails over all)
To: terycarl
2 Corinthians 5:21 For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.
2,561 posted on
10/19/2014 6:59:05 PM PDT by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: terycarl
line 1 does not sem to agree with line 2#1463 seems to disagree with what the Catholic church teaches today.
Any thoughts?
2,599 posted on
10/20/2014 3:53:20 AM PDT by
Elsie
( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: terycarl
I merely pointed out that Jesus died is that also proof positive??? I merely pointed out that Scripture says that ALL will die.
Is THAT not PROOF that RCC's modern teaching about Mary is WRONG??
How about...
1 Corinthians 15:50
Now this I say, brothers, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God;
So; does your church's made-up Mary have a GLORIFIED body now; to be able to perform like a Superwoman in Heaven?
2,600 posted on
10/20/2014 3:56:50 AM PDT by
Elsie
( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson