You asked about the Bible being banned by the Catholic Church. I told you that if You cite a specific incident or two via freepmail that I will be glad to answer you via freepmail.
That is a post Apostolic historical event.
YOU then asked me to prove this historical event using scripture. I told you that you can't prove post apostolic history using scripture and YOU again repeated your request.
The only logical thing to do was post an absurd example to demonstrate to you the error of your way.
Once again if you Freepmail with a specific incident or two I will be glad explain exactly why the Church banned those translations.
Frankly I freely admit that some translations were banned, and i am proud that the Catholic Church cares so much about the truth and scripture that it is willing to take these hits over the centuries.
It was proven by John in Revelation that most of the assemblies had already strayed not 50 years after bing formed. Why would anyone trust anyone 300 years later? The Catholic Church can’t prove they stand on the teachings of Christ and the apostles by their own admission. To rely on them is eternal death. And you want to “privately” teach post apostolic doctrine?