To: Alex Murphy
In other words, calling someone a "fool" was making an eternal judgment against them: declaring that there is some minimum physical/mental condition that a person must possess and exercise in order to be forgiven/saved.That's an extremely interesting point!
8 posted on
10/01/2014 11:18:50 AM PDT by
Tax-chick
(Feeling fine about the end of the world!)
To: Tax-chick
In other words, calling someone a "fool" was making an eternal judgment against them: declaring that there is some minimum physical/mental condition that a person must possess and exercise in order to be forgiven/saved. FWIW, I left out the finishing part of that statement. Here's the complete thought:
In other words, calling someone a "fool" was making an eternal judgment against them: declaring that there is some minimum physical/mental condition that a person must possess and exercise in order to be forgiven/saved. If the church treats the low-functioning autistic person as only a disruption, as if they are incapable of "getting anything" from attending church, it is tantamount to a declaration that they are fools.
9 posted on
10/01/2014 11:45:10 AM PDT by
Alex Murphy
("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson