Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Alex Murphy
In other words, calling someone a "fool" was making an eternal judgment against them: declaring that there is some minimum physical/mental condition that a person must possess and exercise in order to be forgiven/saved.

That's an extremely interesting point!

8 posted on 10/01/2014 11:18:50 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Feeling fine about the end of the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick
In other words, calling someone a "fool" was making an eternal judgment against them: declaring that there is some minimum physical/mental condition that a person must possess and exercise in order to be forgiven/saved.

FWIW, I left out the finishing part of that statement. Here's the complete thought:

In other words, calling someone a "fool" was making an eternal judgment against them: declaring that there is some minimum physical/mental condition that a person must possess and exercise in order to be forgiven/saved. If the church treats the low-functioning autistic person as only a disruption, as if they are incapable of "getting anything" from attending church, it is tantamount to a declaration that they are fools.

9 posted on 10/01/2014 11:45:10 AM PDT by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson