Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurker; Unam Sanctam; x_plus_one; Patton@Bastogne; Oldeconomybuyer; RightField; aposiopetic; ...

In the Religion forum, on a thread titled The Annulment Argument: a Quick Guide to the Two Sides, Lurker wrote:

I read the entire Bible. I never saw the word “annulment” in it once. Perhaps I have an obsolete version.

So what is the correct view? Never allow divorce? Never acknowledge fraudulent or mistaken weddings happen? Or some super secret jury that allows what you want?


5 posted on 09/22/2014 6:57:50 PM PDT by narses ( For the Son of man shall come ... and then will he render to every man according to his works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: narses

“So what is the correct view? “

The Biblical one, of course. I’m not surprised the catholic church struggles with it so.


6 posted on 09/22/2014 7:07:07 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson