Your comment: Because if Jesus violated the Law in consuming blood, He would have sinned, become a law breaker, and could have not been the spotless, sinless Lamb of God who could take away the sins of the world.
The only reason His death was efficacious was that He was without sin. That’s the only reason He could conquer sin and death.
I see that you speak for God and can attribute sin to him or tell God that his words have no meaning. You are amazing that you know exactly what God does or can do. So you must know more than 2000 years of the Catholic Church teachings.
Good Luck on Judgement Day. I do hope that you get to Heaven, but please don’t try to correct Catholic teaching and faith.
It is no big thing for a bible believing Christian to know more than 2000 years of corrupt Catholic teaching...Catholic religion knows very little about God's teaching but knows heaps about useless human philosophy...Man's wisdom...That is what your religion is based on...Not God's wisdom but man's wisdom...
Breaking God’s Law is sin.
That is not me speaking for God. HE declared that to be the case.
He clearly forbids the eating of blood. To do so is sin.
If Jesus had eaten blood, He would have sinned.
There are no if’s and’s or but’s about it. His death is only efficacious because He had no sin.
Tell me what’s wrong with that line of thinking and why instead of just attacking me.