Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna
From a strictly legal standpoint, that is incorrect.

A jury may disbelieve all or part of a witness' testimony, even if that witness is unopposed.

As a practical matter, the jury will be asking why no opposition. If it came to that, I would put the priest on the stand and lead him through the canon law on confessions. "So she can say anything at all - that she came to confession even if she didn't - that she told you something she never told you - and you are bound not to answer - cannot answer even if it costs you your life - "

61 posted on 09/06/2014 7:06:53 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ecce Crucem Domini, fugite partes adversae. Vicit Leo de Tribu Iuda, Radix David, Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: AnAmericanMother
Hopefully, the church will have competent legal counsel, and will pay no attention to your advice. Once the priest is put on the stand, he will be in far more jeopardy than he is now.
64 posted on 09/06/2014 7:19:35 PM PDT by FredZarguna (His first name is 'Unarmed,' and his given middle name is 'Teenager.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson