In short, you agree with all the Bishop says, but not his right to say it?
In short, once again an elk has put a hoof in it’s mouth.
As it turns out, I not only agree with the bishop but also wit his right to say it. It would be helpful if the cited article had taken more trouble to better identify the bishop. In a time of spreading schism, describing one as a bishop no longer suffices. Examples: Bishop Fellay, Bishop de Mallerais. Bishop de Gallaraga, etc.