Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: NKP_Vet

But the key difference is that Luther did not consider her to be a co redemptrix.


5 posted on 08/24/2014 4:50:16 PM PDT by The Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Man

Neither do Catholics.


8 posted on 08/24/2014 4:52:23 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: The Man
But the key difference is that Luther did not consider her to be a co redemptrix.

Bingo--or as Luther would have put it, "Volltreffer!"

14 posted on 08/24/2014 5:28:45 PM PDT by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: The Man

I had a big issue with this doctrine when I first heard of it. Apparently, co-redemptrix literally means “with the redeemer” the doctrine refers to her remaining with Jesus (i.e. sticking by his side) throughout her life. It is not, apparently, supposed to be interpreted in the same fashion as more common terms like “co-owner” that assumes an equal partnership.


39 posted on 08/24/2014 10:16:35 PM PDT by Bill93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson