This is the most absurd strawman I have ever seen: One doesn't get to define dispensationalism. It is already defined... and the tenets thereof can be easily found. If one cares to be taken seriously, one should start from a point where one is not just making things up.
lol, the website you linked to doesn’t disagree with any of my nine tenants of dispensationalism.
where do you see the strawman? which tenant do you think is not believed by these people?