>>2. the Bible is to be interpreted literally. no allegorizing or spiritualizing of verses like Origen or Augustine.<<
That must be a construct of your attempts to discredit the those you disagree with due to some serious flaws in your self azsurrance of what you believe. Jesus is not a literal door nor is He a literal lamb. So you see, your premises is already flawed.≤p> >>8. all means all. all does not mean 15%, 53% or 78%. all means 100%<<
Once again wrong as we will see in your next point.
>>9. Romans 11:26 “and so all Israel will be saved” is literally true.<<
During this age of grace it matters not what nationality a person is as far as salvation is concerned. And no indication is given in scripture as to the destiny of each individual who is of Israelie decent. "All of Israel" could well mean that representative members of all of the tribes will be saved as the 12,000 from each tribe would indicate.
>>I don’t think you can find anyone who calls them self a “dispensationalist” who would/could deny any of those nine tenants or principles listed above.<<
I just showed you how what you think has little or no basis in reality. I am a "dispensationalist" and don't believe in your erroneous list. The rest of you post is based on your errors listed so is and should be disregarded as the rantings of one who has convinced no one of his grasp of the subject. Trying to project what you hope others believe in hopes to denegrate those beliefs isn't working well for you nor is it enhancing your credibility.
during this “age of grace”
____
as opposed to the next age of what, works? the law?
“all of Israel” could well mean...... could well mean? so we don’t know what Israel is? you posted about a week ago that 1948 was a fulfillment of prophecy, God was bringing his people Israel back to the promised land.......now we are told it “could” mean something.
see how easily dispensationalism falls apart when confronted?
now we are also told all doesn’t mean all....okey dokey.
I am not a dispensationalist, but I know plenty of them, and have argued often with them, and I agree with every bit of your statement.