[daniel1212]

1. It’s not an “RC” dismissal; it is mine. 2. It got the job done. Not noticing when one has been dismissed is just bad mann Rather, you could not refute my refutation of NT pastors being titled "priests," and instead you absurdly dismissed it as not part of proper theology and as irrelevant.

And which attempt was then itself refuted, and once again in lieu of an argument. you resorted to blithely dismissing it as time-wasting, nonsensical irrelevancy.

Thus you have rendered your own responses as , nonsensical irrelevancy, and unfit for meaningful exchange, and provided more evidence why one should not be a RC.

[JPX2011]

Thus you have rendered your own responses as , nonsensical irrelevancy, and unfit for meaningful exchange, and provided more evidence why one should not be a RC.

Is this one of thos examples of utilizing the internet postings of other parties as evidential to confirming the assured veracity of one's own infallible conclusions?

[dsc]

“Thus you have rendered your own responses as , nonsensical irrelevancy, and unfit for meaningful exchange, and provided more evidence why one should not be a RC.”

Well, you do have the ability to declare victory at the drop of a hat, in conflicts in which only you are participating.