Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: daniel1212
Excellent observations...And what tickled me was this one:

Rather, what Newman "knew" or should have was that history could not be reconciled with Rome's reality expect thru the specious Development of Doctrine ,” which makes a Weeping willow (Salix babylonica) tree out of an acorn.

And that's what we have here...God plants an acorn and a willow tree claims it is the final result of that acorn...And for those who don't know, an acorn produces (is the seed of) an oak tree, not the Catholic willow tree...

1,098 posted on 08/03/2014 8:59:19 AM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1057 | View Replies ]


To: Iscool
The difference is unmistakable, yet

The epithet babylonica in this Chinese species' scientific name (S. babylonica), as well as the related common names "Babylon willow" or "Babylon weeping willow", derive from a misunderstanding by Linnaeus that this willow was the tree described in the Bible in the opening of Psalm 137 (here in Latin and English translations):

Super flumina Babylonis illic sedimus et flevimus, cum recordaremur Sion.

In salicibus in medio ejus suspendimus organa nostra....
Here, "salicibus" is the dative plural of the Latin noun salix, the willows, used by Linnaeus as the name for the willow genus Salix.


By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion.

We hanged our harps upon the willows in the midst thereof. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salix_babylonica

1,099 posted on 08/03/2014 10:31:33 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1098 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson