I wouldn’t accuse him of being an anti-Pope unless he himself uttered words that purport to authorize reception of Communion in the state of mortal sin—or to deny that adultery is a mortal sin.
If the Synod comes up with something heretical, and the Pope is just too weak, or befuddled, or liberal to repudiate the whole thing, that’s not quite the same thing as explicitly teaching error.
The USCCB is OFFICIALLY on record, since 2004, with a policy that a bishop may “legitimately” commit the mortal sin of giving Communion to abortionists. No Pope has seen fit to do anything about it—not Saint JPII, not Benedict, and certainly not Francis.
The American Cardinals and Archbishops get their influence in Rome from the fact that American Catholics inundate them with money for the Church’s “good works.” American Catholics should stop giving ANYTHING to the Church that might find its way to Rome, and demand that Rome send us bishops who do not support abortion and abortionists in public office, and open borders, and treason, etc.
It is American money that induced Rome decades ago to give American bishops the privilege of naming their own successors. Thus, sodomites and Communists have named sodomites and Communists as their successors for 40 years. The flow of money to Rome must stop.
So his approval of Kasper must be explicit? It seems to me that he already did that.
"Saint" JPII allowed others to receive communion in a state of mortal sin and did nothing about it. Has any pope named a saint ever done anything of the sort? The inconsistencies in the Vatican II Church boggles the mind. For anyone to ignore said inconsistencies, boggles the mind even further.