Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: lavaroise
... Notwithstanding it is illegal meddling of enstate inside the church.

The problem is that it's not the government forcing its way into the Church.

It is the Church inviting the government in.

I say this because any contract, either between the government and a company, or between two business entities, has terms and conditions associated with that contract.

In the case of federal contracts, those terms and conditions are outlined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation.

In this particular case, the terms and conditions are listed in FAR Part 22.

The reason why it's not government meddling is that nobody forces the Church to sign that contract.

(NB: Please Note: I am not saying the above to defend the government (I'm not). Imposing this is plain evil. But it shouldn't be imposed on anybody, not just the Church. If the Church, knowing that this FAR clause exists, signs contracts to perform services with the government, particularly as long as this EO exists, then, in truth, it's the Church's fault)

13 posted on 07/25/2014 9:26:13 AM PDT by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: markomalley

I was opposed to the “Faith based initiative” for exactly this reason.


18 posted on 07/25/2014 10:17:22 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson