Posted on 06/20/2014 7:01:30 PM PDT by franky8
Dear Fellow Citizens,
Your letter sharing with me your thoughts on the upcoming “March for Marriage” in Washington, D.C., was forwarded to me while I was attending meetings out of town, and I have reflected on what you have to say. I appreciate your affirmation of my Church’s teaching—not unique to our religion, but a truth accessible to anyone of good will—on the intrinsic human dignity of all people, irrespective of their stage and condition in life. That principle requires us to respect and protect each and every member of the human family, from the precious child in the womb to the frail elderly person nearing death. It also requires me, as a bishop, to proclaim the truth—the whole truth—about the human person and God’s will for our flourishing. I must do that in season and out of season, even when truths that it is my duty
to uphold and teach are unpopular, including especially the truth about marriage as the conjugal union of husband and wife. That is what will be doing on June 19th.
With regard to your request that I not attend the March, and the reasons you give for this request, allow me to explain the following points.
1. The March for Marriage is not “anti-LGBT” (as some have described it); it is not anti-anyone or anti-anything. Rather, it is a pro-marriage March. The latter does not imply the former. Rather, it affirms the great good of bringing the two halves of humanity together so that a man and a woman may bond with each other and with any children who come from their union. This is precisely the vision promoted by Pope Francis, who recently said, “We must reaffirm the right of children to grow up in a family with a father and mother.” Rest assured that if the point of this event were to single out a group of individuals and target them for hatred, I most certainly would not be there.
2. While I cannot go into all of the details here of your allegations against the sponsors of this event and scheduled speakers, I do know that at least some of what you say is based on misinterpretation or is simply factually incorrect. For example, it is not true that the National Organization for Marriage connects homosexuality with pedophilia and incest. What is true is that three years ago a conference was sponsored in Baltimore by the group B4U-ACT for the purpose of finding ways to encourage tolerance for pedophilia. A statement on NOM’s blogpost objecting to this conference affirmed that this is something that would outrage people in the gay community as well. Unfortunately, many conclusions are being drawn about those involved in the March for Marriage based on false impressions.
3. It gives me assurance that we share a common disdain for harsh and hateful rhetoric. It must be pointed out, though, that there is plenty of offensive rhetoric which flows in the opposite direction. In fact, for those who support the conjugal understanding of marriage, the attacks have not stopped at rhetoric. Simply for taking a stand for marriage as it has been understood
in every human society for millennia, people have lost their jobs, lost their livelihoods, and have suffered other types of retribution, including physical violence. It is true that historically in our society violence has been perpetrated against persons who experience attraction to members of the same sex, and this is to be deplored and eradicated. Sadly, though, we are now beginning to see examples, although thankfully not widespread, of even physical violence against those who hold to the conjugal view of marriage (such as, most notably, the attempted gunning down of those who work in the offices of the Family Research Council). While it is true that free speech can be used to offend others, it is not so much people exercising their right to free speech that drives us further apart than people punished precisely for doing so that does.
4. Please do not make judgments based on stereotypes, media images and comments taken out of context. Rather, get to know us first as fellow human beings. I myself am willing to meet personally with any of you not only to dialogue, but simply so that we can get to know each other. It is the personal encounter that changes the vision of the other and softens the heart.
In the end, love is the answer, and this can happen even between people with such deep disagreements. That may sound fanciful and far-fetched, but it is true, it is possible. I know it is possible, I know this from personal experience. When we come together seeking to understand the other with good will, miracles can happen.
When all is said and done, then, there is only one thing that I would ask of you more than anything else: before you judge us, get to know us.
Sincerely,
Most Reverend Salvatore Cordileone
Archbishop of San Francisco
There is a great battle in the Church since Vatican II.
The gang of mostly priests that actually get the microphone are the socialist Left in the Catholic Church.
The bishops who entertain their message are also on the political Left, shushing the traditional Catholics, hobnobbing with Lefty power brokers.
Cardinal Dolan (NY) is no friend to simple tradiional Catholics either.
We know them by their fruit. The good ones are rarely vocal as that requires courage.
( VIVA CHRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming.) ( VIVA CHRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming.) ( VIVA CHRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming.) ( VIVA CHRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming.) ( VIVA CHRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming.) ( VIVA CHRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming.)
Worth repeating~!
Elites are elites, whether political, governmental, educational, military, corporate, media or clerical.
Thank you very much, dear narses.
Cuomo falls under the bishop of Rochester, not Dolan.
Pelosi falls under the bishop of San Francisco, not Wuerl.
Don’t know about Kerry. Write a letter to their bishops and see what they say about giving communion to them, especially Pelosi, since she was publically rebuked by Cardinal Raymond Burke last last September, who said she should not be alllowed to receive communion. Cardinal Burke is the head of the highest court in the Vatican.
http://conservativetribune.com/vatican-denies-pelosi-communion/
{{{BLUSH}}}
:D
Lets see if Salvatore is the real deal.
God, please be with Salvatore now and enter his soul to fight this evil!
“There is a great battle in the Church since Vatican II.”
Try “since A.D. 33”.
CINOs!
And shame on all the Catholic laity who voted those pro-abortion politicians into office, KNOWING full well the Church’s teaching on abortion.
Thank you, you are correct.
Or since Genesis 3.
Preach it sista!
The road to hell is paved with the skulls of bishops!
^^HYPOCRITS^^
New Word?
Amen! I know I did not vote for Coumo and remember you did not too. That was November 2010. I voted then left ny a month later. I watch him on TV. He is a trip. I also think he is cursed. Ny had two “ 50 year” hurricanes with him. His press conferences on Sandy were interesting he blamed it on Lipa. He picked those people. Fake phony fraud .
Then how does that make them good?
I REMEMBER S HOMILY NY A LOCAL PRIEST DEFENDING THE
Harrisburg Seven.
I CERTAINLY NEVER WENT BACK FOR ADDITIONAL TUTELAGE
“The Harrisburg Seven were a group of religious anti-war activists, led by Philip Berrigan, charged in 1971 in a failed conspiracy case in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, located at Harrisburg. The “Seven” were Berrigan, Sister Elizabeth McAlister, Rev. Neil McLaughlin, Rev. Joseph Wenderoth, Eqbal Ahmad, Anthony Scoblick, and Mary Cain Scoblick.[1]
The group was unsuccessfully prosecuted for alleged criminal plots during the Vietnam War era. Six of the seven were Roman Catholic nuns or priests. The seventh, Ahmad, was a Pakistani journalist, American-trained political scientist, and self-described “odd man out” of the group.[2] Haverford College physics professor William C. Davidon was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the case. In 1970, the group attracted government attention when Berrigan, then imprisoned, and McAlister were caught trading letters that alluded to kidnapping National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger and blowing up steam tunnels.[3]”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.