Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is it okay for a Christian to get a tattoo?
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry ^ | 06/18/2014

Posted on 06/18/2014 8:51:05 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Tattoos are making a comeback in present day culture. From teenagers to housewives, they are appearing everywhere, even among Christians. So then, is it okay for Christians to get tattoos? To answer this, we need to see what the Bible says about it, if anything.

First of all, making marks on the skin is mentioned in several verses. The first is in Leviticus and the rest are in the book of Revelation which deal with the Mark of the Beast.

Any Christian would have no problem denouncing the Mark of the Beast and saying it is sinful. Whether or not it is a physical mark has been debated, but it goes without saying that we are not to receive that mark. It is the Leviticus passage that we must now examine. To do that, we need to quote its context.

Lev. 19:26-30, "You shall not eat anything with the blood, nor practice divination or soothsaying. 27 You shall not round off the side-growth of your heads, nor harm the edges of your beard. 28 You shall not make any cuts in your body for the dead, nor make any tattoo marks on yourselves: I am the Lord. 29 ‘Do not profane your daughter by making her a harlot, so that the land may not fall to harlotry, and the land become full of lewdness. 30 You shall keep My sabbaths and revere My sanctuary; I am the Lord."

As you can see, tattooing is mentioned in the context of ancient pagan practices. But does this mean that tattooing is in itself a bad thing to do because unbelievers did it? We have to be careful not to make a logical error known as the genetic fallacy. This error says that something is false because of its origin. For example, it would be a fallacy that because the Nazi regime developed the Volkswagen Beetle, that the VW Beetle is a bad car. Likewise, just because unbelievers get tattoos does not mean Christians should not.

The Leviticus context also tells the Israelites to not round off the hair on the side of their heads nor shave the edges of their beards. Apparently, this is what the Egyptians did and God's people were called to be separate from them. But, why such detail about hair? Perhaps Moses was concerned about the superstitious beliefs of the Egyptians to which shaving the head and beard had a religious significance. If this were the case, then God's people were certainly called to be separate from the false nations and their superstitions.

But, such religious practices that require tattooing, cutting one's own skin, and/or shaving the head and beard are not around in present-day Western culture. So, the admonition against tattooing, based upon the cultural norm, can't apply for today.

If we must conclude that tattooing is automatically bad in and of itself, then we must also conclude that shaving off the hair on the side of the head and shaving edges of men's beards is also equally bad. But, since cutting hair and shaving beards is not sinful in itself, how could we conclude that tattooing is also automatically sinful? We can't.

Freedom in Christ

Something we must examine is whether or not we Christians are required to keep Old Testament Law. No we are not. Now, this does not mean it's okay to lie, to cheat, and to steal. It means that we are not required to keep Old Testament Law in order to get or maintain our salvation. This is because we have died to the law and because of that, all things are lawful to us.

If a person wants to maintain that a Christian should keep the Old Testament Law concerning tattoos, then do they also keep the Old Testament law concerning not shaving the beard? Also, what would they do with the Scriptures that say we have died to the law and that all things are lawful? Would they require legalism?

First, we must retain the truth that we are not to violate any moral law of God. It is always wrong to lie, cheat, and to steal. Such commands are clearly reiterated in the New Testament and are based on the character of God. So, the Old Testament law dealing with morality, is definitely to be upheld. All of the Ten Commandments (except Sabbath-keeping) are referenced in the New Testament as still being valid (Mt. 19:17-19; 1 Cor. 5:11; 6:9; Rev. 13:6).

Second, we see no New Testament commands that tell us to keep the sacrificial system, forbid work on the Sabbath, forbid the shaving of beards, or forbid tattoos, etc. Since we have died to the law and all things are lawful (excluding, of course, sin), then the Christian is not under obligation to keep the Old Testament command not to get tattooed. Remember, if tattooing is a sin, then so is shaving the beard -- if we were to retain its command and the ones with it.

Third, let me ask a question. Is it okay to eat meat that has been deliberately sacrificed to idols? Would it be a sin to buy such meat in the marketplace and consume it as a Christian? The answer is, it's not a sin.

1 Cor. 10:25-29, "Eat anything that is sold in the meat market, without asking questions for conscience sake; 26 for the earth is the Lord’s, and all it contains. 27 If one of the unbelievers invites you, and you wish to go, eat anything that is set before you, without asking questions for conscience’ sake. 28 But if anyone should say to you, 'This is meat sacrificed to idols,' do not eat it, for the sake of the one who informed you, and for conscience‘ sake; 29 I mean not your own conscience, but the other man’s; for why is my freedom judged by another’s conscience?"

Paul is telling us that a Christian does not need to worry about a "pagan connection" because he is free in Christ. In this case, the Christian is free to eat meat sacrificed to idols. But, Paul makes it clear that we are not free to stumble anyone else such as a weaker Christian. We need to be wise in the application of our freedom and not cause anyone to stumble.

The point is that we are free and because of our sanctification in Christ what we touch becomes sanctified. The meat sacrificed to idols does not hurt the Christian when the Christian consumes it. If it were a sin to buy and consume such meat, Paul would have said so. Likewise, if tattooing is to be considered a sinful act because of its connection with the pagans of the Old Testament, and thereby we are not have anything to do with it, why did not Paul carry over the same logic to the issue of meat openly sacrificed to idols?

So, should a Christian get a tattoo? Well, personally, I would never do so. I would never mark my body permanently and I don't think it's a wise thing to do as a Christian since it is something that might be misinterpreted as being "ungodly." But, this is my opinion. Other Christians have other opinions and each Christian is free to choose what he or she should do in this matter. The Christian should seriously consider the ramifications of a permanent marking upon the skin -- which often includes a social stigma. The Christian should ask whether or not it is a good witness and this is something only that individual Christian should decide.

Should we divide over this?

No, we should not divide over this. If personal opinions override scriptural teaching concerning our freedom in Christ, and division and anger are the result, then those who are dividing over this are the ones in sin.



TOPICS: Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: bible; christians; scripture; tattoos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last
To: SeekAndFind

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/getreligion/2009/10/missing-the-point-of-coptic-tattoos/

Of course that is a culture were Christians get tattoos for a presumably practical purpose, as opposed to a flying panther or something.

Freegards


21 posted on 06/18/2014 9:03:56 AM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Don’t get me started on piercings.


22 posted on 06/18/2014 9:04:17 AM PDT by Veggie Todd (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

But, how will you show your individuality without conforming to the trends of the day?


23 posted on 06/18/2014 9:05:20 AM PDT by FrdmLvr ("WE ARE ALL OSAMA, 0BAMA!" al-Qaeda terrorists who breached the American compound in Benghazi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We are made in the image of God. Satan wants nothing more than for us to be humiliated, tainted, and disfigured. What success he has when Christians do it to themselves!


24 posted on 06/18/2014 9:05:44 AM PDT by mn-bush-man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

My husband and I have done mission trips to Central America and former Soviet block countries.

Both areas consider tattoos to be demonic.

As a result, the ESL mission team we work with will allow no visible tattoos, (or multiple piercings).

This often keeps younger people from joining the team.

If tattoos keep Christians from doing mission work, that alone should show us that they are wrong.


25 posted on 06/18/2014 9:06:10 AM PDT by Mrs.Z
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Tattoos were (and many say still are) signs of the underclass of society, i.e. incarcerated felons usually marked their bodies while in prison or before.

They were also the province of drunken sailors or other military members often in foreign countries, though my own father got his in the 1940s in San Diego where he was stationed for a time in the Navy.

My father, like so many other navy guys, usually tried covering them up wearing long sleeved shirts, if the tattoos were on their arms.

When Americans adopted the styles of the gang-banging hip hop culture, they also began copying the fad of getting tattoos.

Soon, Hollywierd began copying the practice of the gang bangers and sporting tattoos! Next, the fans of the Hollywierd culture copycatted the practice.

I personally find it disgusting to see young pretty girls sporting "tats" as they call them on their arms, legs, shoulders and/or hips.

I probably feel the same about boys but as I don't have any, haven't faced the prospect of having a son come home with a tattoo but a friend who recently did. She told her son that she hoped he enjoyed getting his tattoo as he was not going to enjoy getting it removed and paying to do so!!!

I understand in the plastic surgery business, tattoo removal is a very lucrative business as most young people who get them, find that in order to get a good job, that "tat" has to go!

26 posted on 06/18/2014 9:06:47 AM PDT by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
What is there to discuss?

What about, for example, the biker dude or chick that lived a former life that was not as a Christian, but has since his/her tattoo days have come to believe? I am sure there are many other examples of being reborn in Christ with tattoo bodies.

I don't believe Jesus would send them away.... My opinion.

27 posted on 06/18/2014 9:08:18 AM PDT by rface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

From my observational experience, Some of the people who whine about being the poorest have the most elaborate and expensive tattoos...


Don’t get me started. Oops. Too late

I’ve noticed with men that the uglier the guy is, the more likely he is to wear ear rings or facial hardware. A “manly” looking attractive guy needs no such adornment to get attention.

Also, on a side note, I saw an extra plus sized 30ish woman in Louisville last week who had seven or eight tatoos on her arm that looked like she just pulled a choice out of the tatoo catalogue when she had an extra $39.95. The tatoos were all relatively small and dissimilar - just sort of thrown in at various angles wherever they would fit.

I’m not even a fan of tatoos but her mish mash in an odd way made me kind of appreciate good ones.


28 posted on 06/18/2014 9:08:54 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gdani

I don’t think picking a choosing from Leviticus is such a bad idea. Leviticus is a breakdown of what God says is good for us. It tells us how we can please Him. I mean, don’t you want to please God? Should we ignore the whole thing? Is putting marks on your body like the heathens do that important to people that they would risk displeasing God?


29 posted on 06/18/2014 9:11:51 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Historically, tattoos and piercings were either used to mark slaves, or show your devotion to your particular god. Since my particular “God” wants an inner change and not an outward one, I will leave my skin the way He made it.


30 posted on 06/18/2014 9:13:03 AM PDT by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Is it okay to mutilate one's body since tats are one form of body mutilation? Body mutilation was as popular 3,000 years ago as it is today. Consider your body like a temple or a house. How would you treat it? Would you punch a bunch of holes in it and paint graffiti all over it?

Take a look at all of the various types.

Do you really think God wants you to look like this?


31 posted on 06/18/2014 9:13:04 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

Your opinion would be correct. There seem to be some here today that want to pick and choose which scriptures to follow. I challenge them to follow all tenants of the old testament law then, completely and perfectly.

Is it okay? For me, no. Don’t like them. Is it a sin? Absolutely not. Unless it becomes an idol. But then, FR is a sin for some who have made this site an idol.


32 posted on 06/18/2014 9:13:22 AM PDT by okkev68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rface

I totally agree with you.

It would be like not allowing a former prostitute to become a Christian.

We are ALL sinners after all, to one degree or another.


33 posted on 06/18/2014 9:14:04 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sure, go ahead ...


34 posted on 06/18/2014 9:14:27 AM PDT by ßuddaßudd (>> F U B O << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

Of course not.


35 posted on 06/18/2014 9:14:38 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
A tattoo is a permanent reminder of a passing fad when someone decided to express their individuality by doing the same thing everyone else was doing.

Right on target!

I would add, "A reminder of a serious step in yielding control of your life to peer pressure, worship of "popularity" and a good chance that there was alcohol involved in the decision making process."

I remember the sailor in the rack below me waking up after shore leave in a foreign port, seeing the fresh tattoo of a rose on his arm, first asking "Where did THAT come from?" then wailing, "My wife is gonna KILL me!".

"Tramp Stamps" convey a message. Ask yourself before getting that tattoo, "What message am I trying to send with this tattoo?"

36 posted on 06/18/2014 9:15:41 AM PDT by BwanaNdege ( "For those who have fought for it, Life bears a savor the protected will never know")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

your response is almost verbatim of my own - why spray paint the Temple.


37 posted on 06/18/2014 9:16:08 AM PDT by Revelation 911 (stalker of ansel12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A priest friend of mine has a small Carolingian cross on the left shoulder of his back. He did it as a permanent sign of whom he belongs to, one that he would not be able to deny.


38 posted on 06/18/2014 9:18:19 AM PDT by newheart (The greatest trick the Left ever pulled was convincing the world it was not a religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gdani

So, I guess I must not be a Christian. Mmm

My tattoos were well thought out and have a great deal of meaning. Representing my family and friends and life changes. I have thought about getting another one. I was 49 for my 1st one. Not a young kid. Oh, no, I have pierced ears too!
Guess I know where I stand in this community.


39 posted on 06/18/2014 9:19:14 AM PDT by ozaukeemom (Is there even a republic left?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Tattoos and Body Piercing: Adolescent Self-Expression or Self-Mutilation?
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/popular-culture-meets-psychology/200907/tattoos-and-body-piercing-adolescent-self-expression-or

In mainstream professional journals, including “The Journal of Psychosomatic Research” and “Pediatrics,” tattooing and body piercing have been associated with dangerous and sometimes lethal risk-taking beavior, eating disorders, self-loathing, substance abuse, depression and social alienation.

Might there be alternate, less pathological explanantions for this tsunami of seeming self-desecration?

Tattoos, body piercings and self-harm - is there a link?
http://bps-research-digest.blogspot.com/2008/07/tattoos-body-piercings-and-self-harm-is.html#.U6G8DLGSCog

Some people say cutting their skin brings them relief from emotional pain - an act usually referred to as self-harm. Others enjoy having their body pierced with metal and their skin inscribed with permanent ink. Is there a link between these acts? According to the German psychologists Aglaja Stirn and Andreas Hinz, in some cases there might well be.

The researchers collaborated with the body modification magazine Taetowiermagazin, recruiting 432 of their readers to complete a comprehensive questionnaire about their tattooing and piercing practices and motives.

One hundred and nineteen of the participants admitted to cutting themselves in childhood. That’s 27 per cent of the sample - a much higher proportion than is found among the general population of Germany: 0.75 per cent.

Compared with the readers who said they had never self-harmed, those who had were more likely to report “bad things” having happened in their lives, and to say they had previously had a bad relationship with their own body.

Moreover, the self-harmers reported that they often had their skin tattooed or body pierced to help overcome a negative experience, or simply to experience physical pain. Another clue that self-harm and piercing/tattooing might, in some cases, be linked, derives from the fact that many of the self-harmers said they had ceased cutting themselves after obtaining their first piercing or tattoo.

Stirn and Hinz concluded that most people who partake in body modification clearly do not do it because they have any psychological problems. “However,” they continued, “because body modifications have become so common and accessible, they are also used with probably increasing frequency as a convenient means to either realise psychopathological inclinations, such as self-injury, or to overcome psychological traumas.”


40 posted on 06/18/2014 9:19:49 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson