You are coming across as a bit obsessive here. You already wrote me a long couple of PMs on doctrine. I said I was too busy to get to them right away but I would address them as time permits. Then I asked you a non-doctrinal question.
You didn’t answer it. In fact, you acted as if it didn’t exist.
You unconvincingly claimed that what looks like a serious comment, with no indication of sarcasm, is sarcasm. Sorry; it still doesn’t come across that way. If you want to interject sarcasm into an otherwise serious discussion, you need to give some clue/hint as to what you’re doing. Otherwise, it doesn’t play.
You evidently have a lot, lot more time than I do. You also seem too focused on winning the doctrinal debate to see anything else. Here’s a tip for you. When you’re exchanging comments with a person who has far less time than you, it’s a good idea not to pile on so many unanswered posts that the other party just throws in the towel. Some people know this innately. Others need a heads up. (Put another way. If you snow a person under too large a pile of unanswered posts, they may just decide they’ll never have sufficient disposable time to properly catch up, & give the whole exchange the heave-ho.)
To reiterate. I punted on the doctrinal discussion temporarily, & broached a non-doctrinal issue. In what is becoming a bit too typical, you breezed past my actual question & went peddle to the metal back to the doctrinal issues.
& you see no communication problems whatsoever? To you, this is the ideal debate?
We are talking past each other, and there is no reason to continue.
Good Day.