“That is also postmillennial belief.”
So? Being both a postmillenialist and a preterist does not mean you are not a preterist.
“Certainly. I am not ashamed of what I believe, and I am willing to defend it with scripture; unlike you, who cannot defend your beliefs, and appear to be ashamed of it.”
Now you’re just being silly, I already told you exactly why I am not interested in debating beliefs with you. It’s an exercise in futility, since you are too emotionally attached to your beliefs to admit any error, no matter how clearly it is demonstrated to you.
“It is only preterism when one believes all prophecy was fulfilled in 70 AD, including all resurrections.”
No, what you are defining is full preterism. Preterism is not limited to that definition.
“Postmillennialists, like myself, believe in a general resurrection after the so-called “millennial” reign, which began in the first century.”
Then postmillenialists are, by definition, at least partial preterists. There’s no weaseling out of that.
“You really should get your facts straight before casting aspersions. It makes you look petty.”
I’ve got my facts straight, and any unbiased poster can easily tell which of us is being honest and which is being evasive. The fact that you refuse to acknowledge the simplest of facts about yourself makes you look like something as well.
>>>So? Being both a postmillenialist and a preterist does not mean you are not a preterist.<<<
Are you really that thick-headed? The definition of Preterist means that all scripture is fulfilled. Postmillennialists, like myself, do not believe that.
>>>No, what you are defining is full preterism. Preterism is not limited to that definition.<<<
Yes it is. By definition, preterism means exactly that.
Jeesh! LOL!
Philip